.
In the 1995 Player Ratings Handbook, Bill James taught us one thing we never forgot. (He reviewed each MLB player with the kind of Q-and-A-yourself shtick that we use here, and I liked the way it chunked the information.) He stated in the introduction that he wasn't going to "ask" any question -- ANY question -- that more than 50% of his readers already knew the answer to. In other words, he was going to keep it fresh.
So when ventilating our outrage over the March decisionmaking, we're not going to restate these points:
No disrespect, of course, but that's why we're not going to restate GLMuskie's accurate observation. Suppose you followed Baker's logic with EVERY young pitcher?, but on to the SSI take.
.
Q. Does Geoff Baker believe that Erasmo Ramirez is a poor choice for an ML rotation?
A. Baker is -- in essence -- accurately RELAYING to us the EMOTIONAL RESPONSES of the Mariner shot-callers.
Baker definitely does not disagree. But keep in mind that he is taking pains to explain the way Wedge looks at it. And he's saying, "MLB shot-callers are not idiots, to be contrasted with bloggers' genius. Wedge's position is rational."
When Baker seems to argue that Ramirez had just a little taste of success in a handful of starts last year, and that we don't know much, hey man, maybe he's a meatball, that's where the train derails. But the rest of it is pretty well on track.
.
Q. How many other teams in MLB would hesitate to start Erasmo Ramirez in Safeco this April because of endurance concerns?
A. I hereby accuse the Mariners of being the ONLY team in the majors that would consider this any factor with respect to Erasmo Ramirez specifically.
I lodge this accusation without any qualifications whatsoever.