HQ 2012: Pineda Two Thumbs Wayyy Up
............
Got my prrrrecious in the mail today. First up: find those Mariner players that HQ likes more than Seattle fans do.
Highest on the list of HQ raves: Michael Pineda. Well, it woulda been pretty much impossible for HQ to wax more ecstatic than SSI, probably. But we can tell ya this: HQ likes Pineda a whale of a lot more than the "Shed Pineda Before It's Too Late" bloggers do.
............
HQ gives Pineda as the #9 roto SP draftee in 2012, American League, giving the Mariners by far the best 1-2 starting pitcher combo outside of Los Angeles.
They run a blizzard of component stats, with the key "BPX" (peripherals grade indexed to 100) being 150. Their verbal comment:
"What 2nd-half slump? ERA spike came not from 'fatigue,' but from an unlikely-to-repeat 58% strand rate.
"In fact, skills were even better in the 2nd half -- BPV, xERA tell the real story.
"And he did it all at age 22, in his first big league season. With health, this is a Cy Young winner in the making.
"For now, IP limits impose a ceiling on his (roto) value."
.
=== Better In the 2nd Half? ===
I remember Pineda's second half as being one in which his K's exceeded his IP's ... in one which his velocity ran at 89-90 mph in the first inning or two of some games ... and one in which a lot of base hits knocked in a lot of runners ... and one in which SSI carried on the fight against the Michael Pineda naysayers.
But I'll frankly admit that I didn't remember Pineda's peripherals being superior in the second half. Here, this is what Ron is referring to:
1H 2011 | 2H 2011 | |
W/L ERA | 7-5, 2.65 | 2-5, 5.35 |
xERA | 3.58 | 3.16 (!) |
K | 8.7 | 9.7 |
BB | 2.8 | 3.0 |
GB% | 31% | 44% |
HR per 9 ip | 0.7 |
1.3 |
Strand rate | 77% | 58% |
xERA is better, because Pineda threw ground balls in the second half, and xERA assumes that if the ball is hit on the ground, then it's not going over the fence.
Dr. D does remember Pineda's velo being down, early, in four or five starts. How much? Not much. Here is his average velo by start, in chart form, rat cheer.
In the cold light of the winter candle, Pineda's velocity didn't do anything unusual for a 22-year-old who got real excited and hucked the stuffing out of the ball in April and May. It looked shocking at the time, like watching Randy Johnson throw an 89 fastball, but Pineda always got back up into the 94-97 range.
.
=== ERA Detox, Dept. ===
Had not noticed that Pineda's strand rate had been a measly 58% in the second half. (There was only one pitcher in the majors with a strand rate less than 65% last year, that being Carmona at 62%.)
I doubt that Pineda's RP's let him down -- Wedge tended to let Pineda go six, and then pulled him at the end of the inning.
About 25% of the strand rate can be tagged to the home runs, and about 75% of it to simple bad luck.
It's a funny thing. :- ) We tried to wean ourselves off of ERA, about twenty-five years ago. We never did, did we? A guy runs a 5.00 ERA and all the rest is a baloney dump. You're making excuses for a lousy pitcher.
We doth protest too much, that we don't care about ERA at all. Actually, on the subconscious level, it's all we care about. Do you remember this article? March 16, 2011, Pineda pitched great but gave up runs. Runs are ERA, cap'n.
.
=== GB Profile ===
HQ looks at the profile and says, wow, 9.7 K, 3.0 BB, and 44% grounders - he got even better!
Naaaaaah. SSI would suspect that there were more grounders because Pineda, laboring with a dead arm, went with located (knee-high, or outside) fastballs in Felix style. (The sliders are naturally topped if anybody ever makes contact.)
With the semi-dead arm, Pineda kinda pitched more, and got more grounders. I wouldn't call that improvement. That's not flying, Buzz, it's falling with style.
.
=== Dr's Prognosis ===
Pineda will of course come back to camp with his 98 mph locked and re-loaded. Maybe it will be 100 mph this time. He's growing physically.
First half, with the live arm, Pineda goes back up in the zone again, the groundballs go down again, and Pineda cements himself (in skeptics' minds) as one of the superstars of the game.
.
=== Baseball HQ ... er, IQ Dept. ===
The question arrives as the season goes on, whether Pineda can pace himself well enough to stay strong for 180+ IP. I couldn't tell you how to pace yourself through a major league season.
But Michael Pineda is -- b'lee DIS, bro' -- unusually intelligent on the mound. He was beating lineups the 2nd and 3rd time through. He was taking as much of the plate as he intelligently could, fanning 9 guys while walking only three. He was canny enough to ditch his changeup and work with a 2-pitch attack. His pitch sequences were genius at times -- I certainly could never tell what was coming next. Hitters did not catch up to him in their 10th plate appearances.
Just because a guy looks like he could rip one of your limbs off does not mean he isn't smart. If Michael Pineda looked like Jamie Moyer or Greg Maddux, I'm sure he'd have drawn raves for the way he outsmarted AL hitters in his rookie season.
Hopefully Pineda can apply his impressive baseball IQ to the question of throwing 96 mph all year, rather than 98 early and 93 late.
..............
As for the "Shed Pineda While You Still Can" movement in Seattle, c'mon. There's a party going on. Grab a dixie cup fulla fruit punch and relax. There are a lot of years between Michael Pinedas.
BABVA,
Dr D