POTD Marco Scutaro

Interesting thread started by BKafflen at Mariner Central on Marco Scutaro.

.

Q.  Who is this guy?  I think I had him on my roto team for a month in 1998.

A.  As opposed to Jack Wilson, he hits a little more, fields a little less, and will take a dime instead of a dollar.

Jack Zduriencik's interest in Scutaro is, appropriately, the same as your roto team's interest in him.  He's a "steady Eddie" shortstop who fills in when the Grim Reaper has left your roster on life support.

.

Q.  The Jays get Type A compensation for Scutaro if they just keep him and let him walk this winter.  That means the trade price for Scutaro would be too pricey?

A.  IFF your assumption is that a 1st, and "sandwich," pick, are worth like two PCL All-Stars.  But they aren't.

A pick in the second half of round 1, and a "sandwich" (between 1st and 2nd rounds) pick between #31 and #42, aren't worth nearly what fans tend to think they are.  

We went through this once this year :- ) so here's our Febrary article on the subject.  If you wormhole to that link, you'll find 60 picks tabled for you:  all of the ballplayers drafted between #11 and #30 in the first round, years 2004-06.  You'll be blown away by how few ML impact players there are, and how few there figure to be.

A player who is selected, say, #20 in the first round is going to beat the house if he EVER makes an org's top 5 MINOR league prospects. 

For example, Josh Fields (the #20 first-rounder in his draft) is rated by Sickels as the M's #14 prospect.  (Fields isn't in BBA's top 10 that I saw, probably because he signed late.)

When you talk about "a first-round pick and a sandwich pick," we fans tend to visualize that as meaning "Phillippe Aumont and Michael Saunders."  But GM's realize that first-round ammy picks -- if outside the top 10 picks -- aren't nearly the purified gold we assume they are.

Jharmidy DeJesus, Michael Pineda, and a throwin, something like that, might be worth more to the Jays than Type A compensation.   Certainly you could trade Greg Halman and change for a vet of Scutaro's caliber.

.

Q.  But that's how you wind up with Choo for Broussard.

A.  Absolutely.

Look, sometimes you're going to trade a prospect and he's going to get good.  At the time Choo was traded, he was labeled "a #4 outfielder at best" by cyber-Seattle -- CERTAINLY a platoon outfielder at the tippy-top.

Broussard was hitting a lefthand 320/360/520 at the time.  Anybody here wouldn't deal Wlad Balentien, right here right now, for a LH 320/360/520 bat?   What happens when Wlad hits 38 homers two years on?

The other team wouldn't trade!, unless there was SOME chance of a guy Choo'ing it.  

But as the Yankees said when I was a kid, that's what your minor leagues are there for.  To trade for good major league players.

.

Q.  IS Scutaro good?

A.  :shrug: like IceX said, you'd be buying high.

His 2009 OBP of .383 looks great.  His career OBP of .334 doesn't.

Granted, he is getting older and he is walking more.  His "EYE" is improving (as it does for most old players) and you can expect his OBP to go up a bit.

But before you swoon away, check his monthly splits.   Did that cost you most of your enthusiasm?  Thought so.  :- )

.

Q.  Could he help THIS team?

A.  Well, if Jack Wilson can, then Scutaro can.  Scutaro can probably still OPS+ 90 for a while, and he's probably an above-average defender (fangraphs' UZR has him #4 among all ML shortstops this year, and had him at a silly +20 runs last year).

With Wilson you'd be getting an 80 OPS and probably an excellent glove, and with Scutaro you could figure a 90 OPS and a quality glove.

In principle I take the offense, because the defense is just conversation.  We're only guessing at it.  Why did UZR have Scutaro at +20 last year -- but actually minus in other years?

Point A:  Scutaro wasn't the starting SS in other years.  Point B:  we don't know what we're doing, measuring defense.

We DO know what we're doing measuring offense:  Scutaro can hit better than Wilson can.  Definitely.  MAYBE Wilson can field better than Scutaro can.  Maybe, probably.

..................

But you can weight defense hard at two positions:  CF and SS.  I won't blame you if you prefer Wilson, considering the position.

.

Q.  So which do you want?

A.  Wilson makes $8M; Scutaro makes $1M.  And it sounds like Wilson would cost more in trade.  Which do you want?

Jack Wilson has five years left as a Major League (TM) Gold Glove (TM) shortstop.  He's going to make $$$$.  He needs to go to some team that wants to build around him.  That's not my team; I don't pay 10% of my payroll to a slick fielder who can't hit. 

Marco Scutaro is a cheaper, and more efficient, tourniquet around the M's gutshot at SS.   BABVA's virtual Safeco team takes Scutaro over Wilson every day and twice on Felix day.

Cheers,

Dr D

Comments

1

...but I don't see why I'm supposed to be dissuaded by Scutaro's monthly splits.  I see one flukishly bad month with a flukishly bad BABIP and three solid months...and all four months running a great eye ratio and playing good D.  What was I supposed to get worried about?

2

:daps:
Well, worried, no... the guy's 33 years old, and his OPS+ is well-entrenched around 90...
................
If folks were hoping for a .380 OBP the rest of this year, they might slow down a bit when seeing Scutaro's OPS+:
132 - April
105 - May
64 - June
104 - July
Scoot's 112 OPS+ this year was banked in April.   ... granted, the increased playing time and improved EYE could mean that he's in for some 100-type offense for a year or two.

3
Taro's picture

Scutaro is a better player than he gets credit for. For some reason his season has completely flown by my radar. Its somewhat similar to the Brayan situation where you have a guy that was labeled early on and never got to establish himself as a regular.
Scutaro has always been averagish defensively at SS and has had a decent enough bat at the position. Thats more than enough to start this league...
Whats interesting though is that BOTH RZR and UZR have Scutaro's GLOVE improving in 2008 and thats continued in 2009. Bill James had Scutaro at +12 in 2008 and PMR had him as THE best SS in baseball in 2008 with a 110.16 rating. Scutaro obviously isn't going to get better tools-wise, but I wonder if hes starting to do a better job of positioning at the MLB level? It would be interesting to hear the Blue Jays fans' opinion on this. The advanced stats are all saying he suddenly turned into a GG caliber guy in '08.
Scutaro is also doing better in '09 with the bat and its not all a fluke. The CT% is at 94.4% and his O-Swing% is at 11.8%. BOTH are career high marks and are very impressive. He makes more contact Ichiro and is patient at the plate like Olerud. Both marks COULD regress, but this does look like an older player that is improving his eye at the plate.
The power is another question and something that I think is more likely to regress a little at Safeco. Scutaro's raw power hasn't improved and his higher IsoP is driven from a higher FB% and its mostly been more doubles. At Safeco the power is probably going to calm down to that .110-20 IsoP range.
Even so, that a better bat than it looks like on the surface. I'd take .270/.360/.385 with above-average D at SS in a heart-beat at Safeco. Thats a nice little player. Think Mark McLemore at the plate circa '01-'02 with a better ability to make contact (similar hitter type).
Fangraphs has Scutaro at 3.5 WAR this season which is Ichiro/Gutierrez territory. Hes not THAT good, but sometimes a player gets in a groove and has a career year. I wouldn't mind benefiting from that career year in 2nd half and then collecting those draft picks. I'm sold on Scutaro. He looks like one of those guys whose using a much smarter approach to the game as he ages (like McLemore).
Actually the more I look at Scutaro, the more I start thinking that hes a late bloomer that started breaking out in 2008 like Russell Branyan. The fact that the Red Sox and Mariners (arguably the two best run franchises in the game today) are after him makes me wonder whether or not this guy is severly underrated. If Scutaro keeps up the improved approach at the plate and if his improved glove is for real...that is quietly an impact-level player, not just a Jack Wilson type stop-gap.

4

As implied in the original post, I would imagine that simply being the everyday shortstop has something to do with his better positioning...
As usual, we see the UZR/150 tectonic plate shift upon Scutaro's change of organization... amazing how often a guy goes from one end of the UZR meter to the other, when he changes uniforms...
If I am a UZR apologist, I want a logical explanation for Scutaro being -28 runs defensively with the A's, and then a few years later (and older) notching a +20 runs with the Jays... waving it off is merely cognitive dissonance.  Same goes for Rauuulllll's supposed -23 with the M's followed by =0 this season with the Phils.
*As pertaining to FGut, I don't doubt that the lad saves +15 or +20, even park-neutral.
.................
We're not going to win a lot of bets by wagering on a player suddenly learning to hit at 33, but I guess if Scutaro found some shady training partners, it could persist for a year or two...

5
Taro's picture

Its possible Scutaro is just league-average defensively although RZR, Bill James, UZR, and PMR all think he got significantly better in '08. I'm thinking hes not as good as his marks are the past two years, but theres probably something hes improved defensively (maybe positioning as you've mentioned).
Offensively his year hasn't been reliant on power as much as its been reliant on his improved batting eye. Both the CT% and O-Swing% have improved, and even if the power stays at career levels he should hit somewhere around .275/.360/.395. I think he might have one or two of those late Mark Mclemore type seasons in him.
 

6

...I can never get fully behid Scutaro even if he becomes an M...why?  Because for a long time, he was an A during their heyday and the little punk hit like .240 against the rest of baseball and .350 with a zillion game winning RBI against the Mariners.  I came to violently HATE him.  LOL

8

... lemme go check...
Slap me silly.  The man did go from an 80 OPS+ to a 110-115 for two good seasons, right at age 36-37.   Mostly because Safeco did not reduce his stats (compare 1996 to 2001-02).   Wouldn't doubt that something similar could hold for Scutaro.
The guy aged well, and circumstances allowed him a few years as a BTA ballplayer.  That's a grrrreat comp for Scutaro fans seeking an upside.
....................
What would be the most you'd give up for Scoots, Taro?

9

I was on the fence regarding Scutaro until Matt's last comment. 
Now please count me firmly on the "get 'im in 'ere" side. 
Anyone that can cause Matt to abandon his Vulcan-like focus on tangible-quantifiable-and-chartables and, in addition, holds the promise of driving Matt to regular pon-farr like outbursts of emotion is worth his weigh in gold-pressed latinum.
Scutaro in '09 -- make it so.
*grins*

10

That was a great (and delciiously Trek-nerdy) post...nice one Tuner. :)

11
IcebreakerX's picture

Scutaro's defensive numbers are probably up because of the FieldTurf he gets in Toronto. FieldTurf is consistent, which is probably a world of difference compared to grass.

Add comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.