.
intro - can't get to a computer much today or tomorrow, so all apologies that I'm not thumbs-up'ing all the new bleacher bums. Will return to that shortly, but in the meantime muchas gracias very much! - Jeff.
We were just getting a baseball-comments tsunami going and please don't let this distract. :- ) The last 4-5 threads are really hoppin'. Please enjoy them on Wednesday. But for those who enjoy the "Life Is Sports" aspect to SSI:
.
ROHRSCHACH (INKBLOT) TEST
BPJ asked us to put up a column on the Mandela Effect. His comment was the first I'd heard about it, which is cool, because it's always fun to hear about a new sci-fi / paranormal subject that has anything to it but silliness.
80, 90% of the topics that are worth a look, wind up going into the wry smile area for me. Those that wind up (for me) being in the "Truth is Stranger than Fiction" category ... Double Slit Experiment, Yoro Fish Rain, Deathbed Visions, Precognition (in very limited applications), N'Kisi the telepathic parrot, a few others ...
HERE COMES THE -LIFE IS SPORT- THINGY
"Skeptic" should mean that --- > you're in extreme doubt about a thing. But you are going to investigate. Like a scientist should: wanting VERY convincing evidence, but with a reasonable openness to the idea that it might be true.
Science is a method of inquiry. Period. It is not a worldview that says nothing exists apart from the periodic table and the laws of physics. Science is not materialism.
"Skeptic" on Wikipedia has been appropriated to mean that --- > you know before you start that the hypothesis is hollow and false. You go through the motions of investigating, but any data that is suggestive is suppressed. It's the worst possible mindset to be in, to be pretending to investigate a thing.
IceX linked us to this Fangraphs article, warning that Drew Smyly could be up for a breakout year. Great link IceX thank you viddy much. Any Denizen who didn't click thru Ice's link gotta go get it right Now. From Sullivan no less. He is sticking to just the fa'ax, ma'am, and he calmly underlines the fact that when established pitchers gain any significant velocity, they have big seasons.
Because Sullivan was confining himself to "pure sabermetrics" (MPH-vs-ERA) he didn't even touch on the key to the VENZ game, though Sullivan would have been well aware of it. Dr. D's big thing was that Smyly threw pitches in on the hands of righties. And that Smyly threw the fastball with purpose at knees and shoulders, changing the eye level (which he doesn't even really need to do, given his curve). And the attack-rhythm thing.
In any case, here's the takeaway for SSI Denizens: --- >the fact that Smyly has (so far in 2017) had extra panache on the ball across his starts, and that it is ON HIS CUTTER TOO, well, that --- > MUCHLY increases the chance of 2017 rainbows and ponies. Rick (who promptly roto-swapped for Smyly following the VENZ game) should almost as thrilled at this news as he was at the original VENZ performance.