Seattle 3, Texas 7 - Slops and Props cont'd

PROPS TO BRENDAN RYAN whose sac fly in the 2nd was 1) critical, and 2) technically admirable.  That was a real tough jam pitch on which to get the ball in the air -- Ryan got it deep enough for Jack Cust.

Though his stats aren't there yet - he's what, 2-for-18? - I like the way he's hitting.  And his EYE is 3:2 early, which is much better than, say, 0:6 as is Ryan Langerhans'.

.

SLOPS TO JACK WILSON'S ERRORS in the 2nd, which were the ballgame -- Felix woulda cruised through 8 and we'd a won, prob'ly.

At shortstop he made 16-18 errors a year, too.  Wilson's great, and I don't really buy that his new position was the problem.  He just dropped an easy catch and then threw a ball away.  I'm not blaming the position.

Would like to know if he got yanked. ... if so, would love to see Luis Rodriguez.  Or even Adam Kennedy, who's a surprisingly tough AB.

It's not that it would make the offense better than it has been; Wilson has hit .353.  But it would make the offense better than it would be.

.

PROPS TO JACK CUST, who, weirdly, may have the ability to hit the ball through the shift.  His BABIP last year was .350 or .389, depending on where you look.   Last couple games he's been at it again.

.

SLOPS TO THE PITCHES ICHIRO IS GETTING; they're pitching around him to get to Figgins.

You can't make any short-term adjustments, because batting 2nd is part of Figgins' veteran entitlement.  You can do the same thing Eric Wedge is doing: --- > sit on your backside hoping that Figgins gets the bat going as soon as possible.

.

PROPS TO ERIC WEDGE for giving Michael Saunders a fair shot.  I unsay my complaints about Langerhans on Opening Day :- )

Hopefully Saunders' chance carries through until he gets a few righties.

.

PROPS TO ADRIAN BELTRE, who is providing us the benefit of his swings-and-misses at pitches outside the strike zone.  Feels awfully good when it benefits our side.  Fair's fair.

.

SLOPS TO THE LOSING STREAK.  I've got a little trick at times like this:  I change the subject.  My recreation, until Friday 7:00 pm, will not involve baseball.

Ballplayers have to live with their results.  I don't.  :- )  For 51 hours, I'm moving to an alternate reality in which baseball doesn't exist, but basketball and good movies and good friends do.  Then, suddenly, I'll move back to the reality in which baseball exists.

See you Friday, Eric!

.

PROPS TO THE SCHEDULE, which now gives us a series of games not involving the Texas Rangers in their ballpark.

Six rawhide-tough games, and they didn't quite go our way.  We, and Boston, will carry on.  It doesn't change the fact that we both got Big Threes and lineups that will go to war.

.

The M's might be 4-and-2 with Luke French, Carlos Silva, Yuniesky Betancourt and Jose Vidro ... or they might be 2-and-4 with Justin Smoak, Michael Pineda and Miguel Olivo.

I'll take the ballclub that is climbing the ladder.

.

Cheerio,

Dr D


Comments

1

Gee....I was fair and gave Figgins some props after his opening day his.  Since then, minus one swing...he's abysmal.  And Houston, we have a problem.  The guy who moved him out of the 2nd spot last year got canned.  Sure allows Wedge some flexability, doesn't it?  A Kennedy day at 3rd might be nice to see.  Or a Rodriguez day. 
and I think I would giggle if I could just see Mike Wilson swing against MLB lefties.  Sure makes sense to roll out two automatic vs. leftie outs.
Drats.  Frustration is a frustrating thing.  I'm not bothered by the losses......we played hard and pitched well, generally......but I am bothered by 29's of this lineup.

2
CA's picture

If you are referring to the mystifying love affair with Langerhans.  If we know one week out that guti is gone for some time, why would we have both he(Langerhans)and Saunders to share CF?  There have been some tough lefties, also information available well ahead of time.  No RH stick for the OF?  Its early, but it looks bleak vs. a lefty starter.  

3
ghost's picture

...both Figgins and Bradley hit for more power and overall better lines against lefties.  But yes, I agree it would have made more sense to go with a right handed bat than a lefty for the OF4 spot while Guti was on the DL.

4

Maybe you're ahead of the curve, and simply right about it ... or maybe carrying a tad of annoyance over from the winter, as Baker is ...
But usually you scout types wouldn't hesitate to take into account the way the first six guys threw the ball against the M's.  Ogando was scintillating.
That they are light on the long ball, no doubts there.  And, yeah, the overall team line is .233/.295/.327.  But that changes against lesser pitching, and just as you wouldn't confuse these guys with the Red Sox, doesn't seem you'd get them confused with the 2010 M's, either ...

5

Langerhans career split:
RHP: .225/.335/.371 (.707)
LHP: .237/.315/.384 (.699)
PERHAPS, the reason Langerhans is around is that he CAN hit lefties (as well as he hits righties, at least), and maybe they are hoping that he can help Saunders in that regard as a player-coach of sorts.

Add comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.