Thanks Jeff. Good work on what hopefully will be a great trade. Sounds like you like Furbush on the hill in the 1st inning? I haven't seen video on him but you have me interested in the following articles.
You are right...that combo has and will continue to work. Still dealing with human minds and reactions.
Dude. You're harshing my mellow.
.
=== PREREQs 101, 102 ===
You'd be better off to read first this article on his mechanics, then this article on his pitch arsenal, then return to read this one. But you're a closet rebel, so indulge yourself and skip the prereq's. Who's to know? Pistons poppin', ain' no stoppin' ... nowwwww Paaaa-nuh-maaaaaaa.... Pan! a! Ma! Hah!
.
=== Defining Attributes ===
We haven't gotten to use the phrase "mutually exclusive and mutually exhaustive" all year. One of my all-time fave concepts in life. It describes the two people in the last marriage I went to ...
To find a young LHP who is truly similar to Furbush, it says here that these moving parts are the ones that give you "irreducible complexity."
- LHP
- 3 legit pitches, all mixed well, all getting K's
- Mediocre to below-average command
- Three True Outcomes in the neighborhood of 7k, 3-4bb, high HR
- It would help if the comp were not graceful physically, a la Moyer, Bedard, Lee ... perhaps being tall
When I was a kid, it seemed like every other left hand starter was like Charlie Furbush. Bill James talked about John Smiley once: "Mixes three pitches, stays aggressive, pitches ahead in the count. It was workin' a hunnerd years ago, and in a hunnerd more, it'll still be workin'."
You'd think that there would be any number of LHP's mixing three pitches 50-25-25, throwing strikes, and carving out a career. Oddly, there aren't, at least in 2011.
.
=== Candidates ===
Although Furbush has a pretty electric all-around game, of course you can't use guys like Erik Bedard or David Price as comps. Bedard is a two-pitch guy; that's a totally different thing.
Sabathia has much too good a fastball; Jon Lester has far too much polish to compare to the raw Furbush, much less Cliff Lee. Any lefty who is painting the corners is going to be a non-starter for this comp.
***
So, which LHP's make a fairly-electric 3-pitch game work, being a little wild in the strike zone?
.
Ricky Romero pitches a lot like Furbush, but better. Romero has a change that is a fearsome weapon, and Romero has pretty good command.
Think Romero's too optimistic. Wup, now that I check it, Romero's got 7+ K and 3-4 walks, just like Furbush.
Furbush could aspire to the Romero comp if his change-curve developed consistent results to match Romero's changeup.
.
John Danks walks 2 batters a game and is therefore shunned as a comp. What's the holdup with Danks, anyway? Why isn't this guy a star?
.
You know what, I always remembered the young Barry Zito as having Bedard-like command. Maybe not. He was always a 7k, 3.5bb lefty, though he worked off two pitches.
Still don't like the comp too well, but I'm talking myself into the idea that a LHP can win with a good amount of walks...
.
C.J. Wilson, since he switched to starting, works off a 91 fastball and three pitches. My problem with that comp is that Wilson's curve has become awfully good lately ... well, maybe not. Visually I thought it was, but Fangraphs says the curve is being hit.
Possibly C.J. is the prototype to which Furbush aspires. In the rotation, C.J. gets 7+ strikeouts and 3-4 walks, just as I see Furbush doing.
C.J. keeps HR's way down because he gets lots of grounders. But then again, we've noted that Furbush's FB has nice sink too.
Yeah, if I were Furbush I'd be watching C.J. tape.
.
Ryan Rowland-Smith, when he first came up, brought it at 90-94 with a vicious curve. IIRC he fanned 10+ men in his first year.
Then the arm went, the 'net scorn stayed .... maybe Charlie Furbush gives us a second go-round, a deja vu on what RRS coulda been if his arm hadn't shredded out so soon.
Seriously: Furbush reminds me of all kinds 'a Hyphen, the first year RRS came up. Good on yer, mate!
.
=== Dr's Prognosis ===
For me, Furbush has a great shot to become a go-to LH reliever on a contender, a #3 reliever behind two big righties -- a Paul Assenmacher, Scott Radinsky type.
In the rotation, Furbush has enough lightning in his game, that it's worth a look to see whether he can put together a Romero-, Wilson-wannabe career. You can't sell Furbush's stuff short. Batters clearly have a hard time seeing his pitches.
He looks a little kludgy to fire 200 IP the next three years, but some lefties are kludgy. It'll be interesting watching his next eight-odd starts.
.
Next (if you didn't read the instructions)
.
Comments
An Assenmacher, Radinsky type, multiple innings, swing man in a pinch maybe, that kind of LHP out of the pen.
But if you have an excellent RP vs an average-solid SP, which way do you go? Most RP's are failed SP's. Not often you see the choice between a fairly good SP or a lockdown RP.
And nice choice to have. I think all that can and should change with a team, a particular season and even a player's make up/genetics and skill level. All things being equal, I wish that people would not be so quick to banish some to the bullpen. 2001 dream team had some non-studs on the hill play a very big part of that rotation.