Konspiracy Korner: Colin Kaepernick
political statements, Dept.

.

James had said:

.

HeyBill, so talking about Kaepernick in Reader's Posts...ever remember anything like that in baseball? How would that play in Boston with the Pats or the Red Sox?
Asked by: OldBackstop

Answered: 8/30/2016
 I can't speak for Boston; I'm not even a Bostonian.   You may remember that Carlos Delgado refused to stand for the National anthem, and this was ten years ago when Post-9/11 patriotism was higher than it is now.    It wasn't as big a deal, because Delgado was not a US citizen and was not playing for a US team, but he did get booed in some cities for a year or so.  

.

And:

.

Not a question, but apropos of current events, it seems to me that in a free country no one should be forced to participate in a patriotic display against his will.
Asked by: bobfiore

Answered: 8/28/2016
 Or a birthday party, either; nobody should have to be in a birthday party.   Or a human resources training session.    Marathon.  Gunfight.   Knife fight.   Marching band.   Shouldn't have to do any of these things.

.

.

DR'S DIAGNOSIS

It is provocative that James would compare [indoctrination towards patriotism] to [indoctrination toward diversity] in the workplace.  Heh.

.

(1) I think I've heard EVERYBODY acknowledge Kaepnick's right to state his view.  Nobody's question is, should he be jailed for sitting during the National Anthem.  

Even the SF Police Union, which called for an apology in Black Lives Matter style, took considerable pains to reinforce Kaepernick's right to state his opinion.

...

(2) What's odd is that he did it during workplace hours, and that the NFL supports this workplace privilege to make political statements during work hours.  I'd thought the last twenty years, the discussion had been trending towards "if you say something contrary to your employer's brand, you can be fired for it," as with Curt Schilling, who made a political statement OUTSIDE of the workplace.

...

(3) I like the fact that Kaepernick received no punishment for his point of view - criminal, civil, or workplace.  In America, the appropriate "punishment" for foolish statements (if that's what Kaepernick's be) is to be proven a fool in public discourse.  Would that this standard were equal on both sides of the aisle, such as when Phil Robertson wants to state his view of marriage in off-hours contexts.

But it's not like Kaepernick sat down, and then downplayed it after the furore started.  He doubled and tripled down with his clarifiations, saying that America is an intolerable place for blacks to live, etc.  Which, again, is his right, as it's any other citizen's right to call that idea ridiculous.

...

(4) I was shocked by the amount of pushback that Kaepernick got.  I had no idea that the "America Stinks" message was still this controversial.  I'd been under the impression that it was mainstream.  Even a lot of uber-liberal San Franciscans seemed annoyed.

I'm still quite confused as to why Kaepernick is drawing so much fire for this.  This would be the "honest question" on which denizens could set me straight.  I wouldn't have expected 1% of the attention that this got.

In my humble opinion, you can see a lot of current-issues debates through this angle:  is a problem basically because America is a fouled-up country, or is it for some external reason?  For example, did the Orlando shootings occur because jihadists are crazy, or did they occur because America doesn't control its own guns?  What proportion of blame do you assign:  55-45, or 80-20, or (as I probably would) 99-1?  This "America the Good/Evil" theme resonates through a lot of topics, it seems to me.

...

(5) Whether Kaepernick be right or wrong, the timing on this is a big distraction for the 49er's.  And it hits me as selfish on that basis.  You get the idea that Kaepernick sees the writing on the wall.  Could be mistaken.  There are many societal ills that an athlete can direct his attention towards, such as Russell Wilson directing his attention towards children with cancer.  For Kaepernick to spray charcoal fluid on the racial tensions at this moment of time seems ill-advised to me, in football terms, but maybe I'm wrong.  Maybe this is the exact moment at which African-Americans can achieve critical mass and achieve racial justice?

I think young black men need to be able to speak, and in their own voices.  Towards racial justices.  But I think the same about old white men.  We'd all like to find ways to help those children who start their lives with the deck stacked against them.

...

(6) My personal opinion is this:  All societies have their plusses and minuses, but I'm very, very grateful to have been 1 of the 25 people worldwide who were born in America.  Twenty years ago, I was a lot more glad to be an American than I am right now :- ) but am still quite glad to not be living in Venezuela.

For me this, as many such "American the Oppressor" stories, becomes a gratitude vs grievance issue at bottom.

...

(7) Three years ago, SSI challenged 49'ers fans to name a dynasty that had been quarterbacked by a punk.  Nyah, nyah, nyah.

:- )

.

Respectfully,

Jeff

Blog: 

Comments

1

Per the contract with the 49er's, Colin signed a 7 year $126 million deal with technically $61M guaranteed IF Colin takes 80% of the snaps during a year. However, if Colin does not take 80% of the snaps, his salary decreases $2M per year PLUS a $125K drop for every game he is active but does not start. Furthermore, every April 1st, San Fran has the option to cancel the rest of the contract.

Thus, Colin will be getting roughly $6.7M guaranteed this year whether he makes the team or not since the Niners did not cut Colin in March, and there is a good chance Colin gets cut next year. 

Thus, Colin could be making a financial decision to force San Fran into cutting him now, so he has a longer time to try to catch on with a new team - and get away from this awful contract with a team that is obviously going downhill fast.

With that said... I am proud to be an American. I am thankful and very supportive of my local law enforcers. Lastly, I wish people would stop creating strawman arguments just to try to divide this country up for political purposes, and start getting active in doing things that would actually help their local communities.

2
Auto5guy's picture

What other team wants to take this on and invite this controversy into their house?  Who wants to rile up and tick off the bulk of their fanbase... espescially for Colin's recent level of performance?

 

Prospective teams would have to ask a themselves a couple questions.  1. Is he really so foolish to think this was a proper way to protest that wouldn't create more negative pushback than positive movement forward, and if so do we want to put someone with so little PR common sense in a position to be the face of the franchise?  2. If it is a cynical calculated move and he's willing to throw molotov cocktails around because he's unhappy in Santa Clara, what will he do here if we eventually tick him off?

 

I can't see any team willing to take him on for a better deal than his what Niner contract is shrinking into.  

4
Auto5guy's picture

There comes a level of radioactive that no one will touch.  Ray Rice never got a second chance even after his official punishment was past.  Vick had to spend some time out of the game and do some heavy public repenting.  Kaepernick is doubling down on his stupidity.  Will that put him over the gieger counter threshold?  Time will tell I guess.

6

Oh Nooo - another American holds beliefs that offend me! I'm sooooooo shocked by that. So shocked that I'm going to go on social media and prove my moral superiority by trolling anyone that doesn't express my exact beliefs. ::eyeroll:: 

The "recreational outrage" that has taken hold of a significant portion of the American public is the most depressing thing about our current era. 

7

I'm not one of the 1 in 25 born in America so my view is from afar and haven't been paying any attention to whats going on before reading this article, but I came across this video of Nate Boyer that I thought was absolutely worth sharing:

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000693173/article/nate-boyer-writes...

A near perfect response to this issue and most issues. Listen.

I lived in the states from age 8 to 14 in the 90's, I Americanised pretty quickly but the level and style of patriotism never felt comfortable for me. Spending the rest of my growing up and adult years in New Zealand the only kind of overt patriotism that approached Americas level is with the national worship of it's rugby team which was always offputting but in more recent years has partially caused me to dislike the team itself.

8

Seems to me that British-descendant, Eurocentric countries (Western Europe, Aus, NZ, etc) find patriotism rather crass.  Head to Latin America, or China, much less the Middle East :- ) and you'll find tribalism far in excess of mine or Moe's.

America doesn't seem particularly patriotic to me until somebody puts a gun to our heads.  But everything is relative, no?  :- )

You might summarize the Boyer audio m'friend.  Most of us won't head over to listen.  Would like the bullet points, though.

9

Our man Colin has now worn socks to practice that depict cops as pigs. Look it up.

Isn't he the cute 14-year old male?

Wait...he isn't 14?

Hey man, he has the right to his opinion, no problem.  Free speech is indeed just that.

I will point out that the Dallas Cowboys were not allowed to wear on their helmets a decal honoring cops. League uniform rules trump fee speech...I get that.

But practice socks are a different deal it looks like. I suppose they should be.  The great muck up here is that we give attention and credence to the action.  I do not believe this is a political protest.  This is attention getting, pure and simple.  Spoiled Brat 101.   "Hey, look at me!!  I'm exercizing my free speech rights!!"  This is 9th grade boys stuff.  Several years ago a high school student in Alaska (at an event off of school grounds but attended by students as a school event) held up a sign that stated "Bong hits for Jesus."  He was suspended and the case eventually hit the Supreme Court (the school's action was upheld).  The young man was reaching for attention...not exercisizing a First Amendment right.  The inanity of his statement is proof enough there.

A NFL QB is entitled to his opinion even if the means of making that statement do not help the cause that he claims to represent.  He's also entitled to behave like a juvenile.  Pig socks are just that.

The NFL has protected his right, in games and in practice.

Would it do so if his socks were racially insulting?  Insulted women?  Gays? Jews or Muslims?  Wouldn't that be free speech, too.

Hmmmmmm??

12

POTUS candidates, and their supporters/critics, need some ideal to aim at.  Trump's and Kap's ideals look like they're pretty close to polar opposites to me.

That said, I do tend to agree that there's 'not much to see here,' another black athlete once again trying to cast himself as a man whose very life (cf BLM), much less his interests, is held in contempt by America and its flag.

Sigh.  If anybody cares I will affirm that it would be a tragedy for Colin Kaepernick to be a victim of unjustified police deadly force.

......

Diderot I appreciate you holding down the progressive end of these discussions.  I do have one simple question that has been milling in my head.

Does it ever give inner-city poor people pause for thought, that they have been voting one party for 40+ years and things are getting worse for them?  For example, wouldn't school choice seem like one strategy that gave young black children more hope than they currently have?

That's not just me spouting off.  At BJOL, James takes it as a given that these 40+ year policies -- welfare, NEA control of schools, etc -- have devastated the inner cities.

I don't mean it flippantly.  I mean it literally.  It seems to me that people vote for candidates who will "affirm" them, give them simpatico, as opposed to voting for candidates who will try something different.

Or not.

13

OK, to respond to several of your points (sorry if some are answering questions with questions):
--I agree that Trump is positing some kind of an alternative.  I cede you that point

--on the 'polar opposites' phrase--how exacltly would you define this?

--'Inner city': at one time I drove through a 95% black neighborhood in one of America's biggest cities to get to my Saturday monring golf game.  It was usually about 6:30am.  NO ONE was awake.  To look down the streets, seeing well maintained homes and lawns, you would have sworn it was as 'white' neighborhood.  My point: all blacks aren't residents of the 'inner city'.  For these people, life has improved phenomenally over the last 40 years.  They go to schools that were closed to them before.  They hold jobs that were closed to them before. I would suggest that conflating 'black' with 'inner city' and Lation with 'barrio' isn't getting us anywhere.  Sorry, this is not a direct criticism of you--we just need to know each other better, don'w we?

--'Devastated'.  Slums are bad everywhere.  Every country, every slum.  Many people in America have risen from them with help from the programs that you and James dismiss.  

Finally, the vote of confidence for a 'better way' sort of assumes that any other way would be better, right?  Like Trump saying to blacks, 'what have you got to lose?"

The answer is the huge gains that minorities have made since the 60's.

14

When we say "inner city" or "barrio" or whatever ... where exactly are we talking?  Or are we going to define "slums" as areas below the poverty level?  Or above a certain crime rate?

Certainly "95% black" neighborhood is not the same thing as "poor" neighborhood.  That goes without saying.

The questions of "define slum" and "are minorities doing well in 2016" are worth backing up and defining.  Thanks.

15

If you substitute the word 'woman' for 'minority' it sort of underscores the issue.

Women on average still make some percentage less than men for the same job.

And yet women have far more prominence in the business/political world (at least) than they did three or four decades ago.

So there's still an imbalance...but also great progress.  

16

Respectfully, diderot....

I'm not sure your right on either claim......even if I don't support either guy you mention.

17

People are free to say what they want.

If someone believes that somehow idiot Kaepernick's exercise of free speech is more dangerous to the country than what Trump is spouting, then...I guess it's a free country, right?

18

And thanks for the comeback!!

And I will say that "potentially" Trump is the more dangerous individual.  Not that Trump is himself actually dangerous (we are yet to know...and there is the filtering effect of Congress to consider)....but that any president with a loose cannon pattern of behavior is more "dangerous" than a 14-year old (behaviorally) NFL QB that few people actually pay attention to.  

20

It's not every day that you can say a guy bought himself credibility by cutting a check.  Will cheerfully give Kap his props on this, however.

If he's not just trying to deflect attention from his performance, not just shooting from the hip, not trying to grandstand, but is $1M sincere, then for me he's in a different category from your garden-variety 'rebel without a cause.'

Good on him for a unifying move.

....

Will admit to some confusion as to his applauding the military during the 9ers' game last night, though.  The U.S. Army contains bad apples as do most police forces, right?  Is "blue lives" simply his chosen cause?  Asking neutrally.

21

So Jeremy Lane sat during the anthem last night to support Kap. Does a Seahawk fuel our recreational outrage too, or is that reserved for players from opposing teams? 

Add comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.