1
In your original post, you came up with a list of top fielders based on peoples subjective evaluations of them. My response was not to diminish the value of subjective opinions or argue that objective analysis is more accurate than the subjective variety. My point was that if you are going to come up with a list of supposedly top fielders and from that list extrapolate what traits are key based on their similiarities, you have to use an objective means to create that list or else your list could be unfairly skewed towards a certain style of player. Since I can't think of how UZR would be biased toward any type of player, I don't see how you can object to using it to make your list.