Add new comment

Another clarifying question...
How does one define #2 vs. #3 etc.
In my mind the defference between a #2 and a #3 isn't neccesarily stuff or even ERA (results) it is how deep in a game a pitcher goes.  With both a #2 and a #3 I see a pitcher who should limit run scoring fairly well and give the team a very good chance of winning, the difference for me is that a good #2 limits the run scoring while being effecient with his pitches and goes at least 6 and usually 7 somtimes 8 innings, thus saving the bullpen and keeping the run scoring down for longer.  This is why I see Snells upside as only a #3, I don;t see how eith his BB issues he can eve go very deep in a game.  I can see him dominating for 5 or 6 innings, but he will always be battling his own pitch counts.
That is why I wonder if RRS can possibly be a #2.  If he can keep the opposition under 3 runs AND go 7 or 8, THAT is a #2!
Another way we might be able to define a #2 is by the 15th through 28th best pitchers in the AL.  #1 through #14 are logically the #1's, so what do the "#2" Era's look like?  This year it is 3.82 - 4.54.  Your guess of 3.6-4.0 for RRS going forward fits very nicely in the upper part of that group :)