1
although the question that occurs is, at what point do resources make turnover a good thing?
The reductio ad absurdum - suppose a team had a $500M payroll had had to buy (and trade for) 25 new players. What would our goal be -- .500, the playoffs, or what?
Because Zduriencik has made the roster so much more fluid, with cheap scrubs like Guti, Lopez, RRS, Johnson, Branyan, etc, he has opportunities to bring in *good* new players, no?