Add new comment

1

Tooling around cyberspace, we saw some comment that this trade is not comparable to the Bedard trade because ... Erik Bedard was never anywhere near as good as Lee.  ::wince::
Bedard had just finished leading the major leagues in xFIP when the M's traded for him -- and did it with a 10K/game scorched-earth policy that Cliff Lee can only dream about.
Lee is certainly more durable than Bedard.  But it's tough to claim that he's a lot more effective than a healthy Bedard, because nobody is.
If Erikkkkk and the M's somehow found a way to get together, and get him out there as our #3 in May and June, and he got on a roll, we'd be talking a 90's Braves-magnitude rotation. 
Kind of a shame that the PR wars threaten to leave Bedard persona non grata in Seattle, because that Big Three could win a World Series for us.    Hey, sweep it for us, for that matter.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.