1
which is why we say 'in absolute terms' it's a great deal. In relative terms, it's within the bounds of precedent...
Heyman says $10 - 10 - 18.5 - 19.5 - 20, which is the same as the previously estimated 6/$100 but with the 6th year, $22m, not on there.
Do you amigos figure that is more the M's preference, or Felix', that the GM-expected 6th year get left off?
I picture the M's wanting a club or vesting option, and Nero declining, saying the value is already very attractive to the M's. Maybe.