Add new comment

1
glmuskie's picture

Nice back and forth IMO.
Have to side with Taro on this one, at least with regards to cost/benefit.
Clearly Z and co. value Gonzalez much higher than Pena, there was no 6-for-1 on the table with him at any time. Everyone agrees, he's the better player with better upside.
But Pena as a close approximation that would not require gutting the farm, that is very very intriguing.
Bear in mind that Gonzales is 95% likely to walk at the end of his contract, rather than sign a new deal. Even if the M's open up the purse strings. He walks and you get two draft picks. So a 6-for-1 deal is really a 4-for-1 deal, long term.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.