Exactly what in Bradley's history and words and actions suggests he's spoiled?
Here's the thing. There are a myriad number of mental illnesses out there. Most are mild enough that people 'function' - but can never thrive.
While much of the current state of psychology and psychiatry might well be at (or just beyond) the "leeches and blood letting" stage of development - here are the simple facts.
IF someone is "correctly diagnosed" - "correctly medicated" - *AND* receives "necessary counseling" -- then mentally ill people can and do change and 'get better' and can thrive.
It is not rocket science to look at Bradley and go: "He repeatedly does things that are detrimental to himself and others." That alone is enough foundation to suggest he at the very least needs to be diagnosed by professionals.
If someone has pneumonia - nobody says - "Oh, quit your whining - cough up that phlegm and get back to work."
Unfortunately, today in America, the default position of those who don't have first hand knowledge of the realities of mental illness seems to be: "Quit faking!"
Well - you can fake the flu. (And I'm betting many readers have faked an illness at some point). But, we don't assume immediately that everyone who says they have the flu is lying. But, with mental illness - those who haven't suffered (or had close family or friends suffer), seem to default that it's all just some choice to behave badly, and the people should just stop. I just wonder if anyone might change their mind if some day in the future - when you are coughing up a lung from a really bad case of the flu - Milton Bradley walks by you and says, "Quit faking, you con man and get back to work."
Add new comment
1