Add new comment

Huge Ackley fan.  Specifically went to see him play against the Mudcats, and he's as good as advertised.
That said ... my initial response to the idea of rushing Ackley up this year is ... "So, why again did we decide to make him play second base?"
While SSI wasn't among those that went apoplectic back in March when the whole Figg/Lop flip-flop was executed -- there was at least acknowledgement that different defensive positions have different subtleties and that while great athetes can often transition more quickly (and SEEMINGLY effortlessly) than us mere mortals realize - it doesn't mean that work and effort and TIME aren't required.
I fully expect to see Ackley in September, when it won't be costing him PT.
But, going to the trouble of taking Ackley, who played CF and 1B in college, and teaching him to play second base for a couple of months to then shove him back into either the OF or 1B --- well, that just makes your organization look stupid.  And, for better or worse, organizations are REAL hesitant to do things that make themselves look stupid, (when they can avoid it).
In September, (if out of the race), Ackley would probably spell Lopez (if he's still around) at second, and give Lopez some time at DH ... or maybe a slosh with an off day for Figgy perhaps.  If still in the hunt, Ackley becomes a potential pinch-hitter against right-hand pitching,
I get that you're just noodling.  But, bringing up Ackley before September *HAS* to come with some acknowledgement of what his DEFENSIVE role is intended to be.  And whatever that role, that has ramifications for those other players on the roster.  Suggesting bringing up the bonus baby who has been playing second for 2 months - when your current second baseman (for only two months) has just caught fire ... I'm having trouble computing the number of negative ramifications.
==============
As for Pineda.  Yes, he's having a great year in West Tenn.  So are about 1/2 dozen other DJaxx.  I get the attraction of the 4.50 K/BB.  But, then again, Chad Cordero currently has a 5.50 K/BB in AAA. 
My belief is that you've gotta be REAL careful in regards to hopscotch farm moves.  If you REALLY believe in Pineda, you've GOT to consider the option years equations for getting the most out of the investment.  (The "easy" hopscotch jumps are when the AA guy is called up for the 1 emergency start, instead of the AAA phenom, because you KNOW you're gonna send the AA back down immediately - and don't think he actually has a real shot at sticking).
By all means, move Pineda up to Tacoma, and see if he can out-perform what Olson did in AAA.  You learn more - and avoid a lot of potential pitfalls with "violent" organizational restructuring.
With Olson and White just called up - (and K-Tex claimed off waivers), you've got an open spot in AAA ... so, by all means, move Pineda up ... to Tacoma.  But, the organization is SUPPOSED to have a developmental machine.  It would be a pleasant change from the Bavasi era to actually USE that developmental machinery rather than simply shove talent up with ferocity (and failure).
=====
Oddly, I am reminded of a scene out of "Chariots of Fire" when the academics bring in Abrams to chide him for hiring a professional coach.  He fights back, (and I believe justly) that these people wish their athletes to achieve "with the apparent effortlessness of gods". 
I personally believe that many of the negative issues we have today in regards to athletics is a result of this unfortunate reality.  WORKING to become great seems to be valued less readily than simply showing up already great.  The 'naturally' gifted athlete gets all kinds of special treatment from day one - and LEARNS that he is supposed to be treated as special. 
So, I for one, am philisophically against rapid (and too often rash) decisions about players based on a month long streak (or slump).  I believe in rewards and incentives.
Has Pineda "earned" a trip to the majors?  No. 
Has he "earned" a promotion to Tacoma?  That's a much easier (and more reasonable) position.