Add new comment

1

Much more effective argument than mine was.  :- )
......................
It seems that most people work to avoid believing that there could E-V-E-R be wilful bias on a ref's part.
Is that logical?  To pattern a belief that no ref, anywhere, ever cares who wins?  (Because if you were ever going to spot a ref on the take, the US-Slovenia call was the most blatant I have seen in 35 years of watching sports.)
...................
Just a couple of years ago, Tim Donaghy pled guilty to betting NBA games.  How do you maintain a belief system that corrupt refs NEVER exist at high levels?  You've got any number of historical examples.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.