Add new comment

I think Ackley is a high likely success story -- "probably" a 100-110 OPS+ hitter -- but with a definite possibility of becoming a 130-ish long time all-star.
Smoak, I'm much more nervous about -- I view his profile as one more volatile - certainly a possible Howard-esque future -- but also a possible Brad Komminsk future.
My concern is this.  Under Bavasi, the entire org was directed into a hatred of the strikeout.  Z may have cleaned house - and the new guys "may" have the skills to deal with cerebral prospects, instead of quick-twitch see-ball/hit-ball types.  But, transitions in any organization are typically messy.  It is "unlikely" that the current Ms organization is a finely tuned machine in regards to player development.  I suspect they're headed in the right direction.  How bad the transition friction is - and how much of an impact it'll have on individual player development (in the short term) - is a complete WAG. 
In general, most of the blog-o-sphere castigates Bavasi for lousy talent selections.  But, the number of ex-Mariners who have succeeded is the red flag to me that says - it wasn't the raw talent that was the primary problem.  (And - except for Ibanez - the longer an M stuck around in Seattle, the worse he got - whether he was home grown or imported from somewhere other than Japan).
It would certainly be nice to get a Chipper or Javy Lopez or even a Furcal out of the current Ms crop.  But, as good as the Braves' development has been, they've had to go find 1B bats repeatedly.  Scott Thorman was the last "next great thing".  Ryan Klesko is the cream of the Braves' 1B crops for the past 30 years.  (He made the All-Star team once ... in 2001 ... with San Diego).  Yet, he ended his career with an .870 OPS and 128 OPS+. 
When the EXPECTATIONS get so high, the payoffs always end up disappointing.  I'm concerned when excitement about a nice crop of farm hands, (of which odds say typically 2/3 will utterly fail), is coupled with the word "dynasty" - then perspective may be a bit skewed.  The Marlins, after their most recent raze-and-rebuild cycle had gathered top 10 prospects from all over.
In 2006, the Marlins had 7 of the top 100 BA prospects:
http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/rankings/top-100-prospect...
The Braves had 4 -- they traded to the Texas, (Salty and Elvis), traded Lewer to KC, and Chuck James washed out. 
Yet, in 2010, the Braves are leading the division, while the Marlins continue to struggle to stay above .500. 
Going from the average 3.333 of top 100 prospects to (perhaps), having 7 or 8 guys crack the top 100 list is great.  It guarantees nothing, except extra text in the BA Insider.