Add new comment

...sorry to say, I think it's completely immoral and difficult for me to respect the use of a person as a lever to sell an agenda. Ever. I don't care what Baker's intentions are...intentions do matter - any good church will tell you that - but the road to Hades is paved with good intentions. Actions matter too. The bottom line is that Baker refuses to be fair to Josh Lueke and that he's abusing a person to sell an agenda. Whether I agree with his agenda (I do, for the most part) or not is irrelevant morally. From where I sit, Baker did an immoral thing and I won't pretend to believe otherwise to make nice.
Of course, Josh Lueke also did a deeply immoral thing...but that doesn't mean Baker should have an all access pass to attack the man. Two wrongs don't make a right.