Add new comment

The only thing that Leuke was "guilty" of from the courts perspective (after the plea agreement) was false imprisonment, which again to the best of my knowledge has no sexual component AT ALL.  EVERYTHING ELSE, including everything you write above, is hearsay and or speculation, in terms of legal court approved convictions and facts, and all I was saying is that if Geoff doesn't want to speculate on Leuke's end, then he shouldn't speculate on the victims end (Leuke admitted SOME guilt so we will speculate and assume he is really admitting to all of it).  That, in my view, is where the in-balance is in Geoff's articles, especially since he wants to hide behind the, I am just presenting the facts ma'am line of reasoning.  The FACTS are that Leuke is "guilty" of false imprisonment, nothing more nothing less.  
BTW as an aside, evidence != fact.  Evidence is information, and information only; the conclusion that one draws from that is a judgment call.  In reality the indisputable facts in this matter are really none at all, however the way the Geoff wants to define fact (at least as far as Leuke goes) is only what the judicial system judged to be the facts.  In that case the judicial system judged that there was indeed NO RAPE, in fact no sexual crime at all!
In the end the unbalance in Geoff's articles come from the willingness to speculate on the victims end but the unwillingness to do so on Leuke's.
And once again for the record I think that everything Leuke did that night was wrong and he deserved punishment for it (which he has received, both in the court of law and the court of public opinion).  Please don't read my call for balanced reporting and consistent treatment of the facts (or no facts) as an endorsement of Leuke the man or the baseball player.  However I also believe in second chances and the fact that good people can do things that they regret with all of their hearts especially while intoxicated.
Also, I would like to take this opportunity to thank Geoff for being in my view the best sport writer in Seattle.  In reality his reporting compared to other sports writers in the region and in the country is incredibly balanced and unbiased, and huge props for him for actually interacting with those who take umbrage here or there.  And in the end I (and probably most everyone else) probably wouldn't have even commented on the matter if it hadn't been such a hot button issue about a sports team with NOTHING ELSE TO TALK ABOUT because the season has been over for months!  :)