1
If that was the underlying tone, then I missed it, but I am not attuned to Seattle nuances. I think:
1. Either Z was negligent or tried to pull a fast one -- neither firable, but legitimately newsworthy for Geoff's beat
2. Lueke's DNA proves that he did something extremely unsavory and very unlikely to have been consented to, and the woman, in fact, says it was not consented to, and her story has held up better than his
3. I did not read Baker to advocate banning Lueke, but, if he did, I was not defending that.