1
I think what people keep missing:
It appears she doesn't know if she consented to "thing A" but she is certain she did not consent to "thing B" and "thing C."
"Thing B" and "thing C" are not usual consequences of barhopping with ballplayers you barely know, even if "thing A" could be considered to be so by a typical young athlete (rightly or wrongly).
Lueke's DNA shows that "thing B" and "thing C" took place.
I think he is very fortunate to have gotten the outcome that he did.