1
Regardless of whether Sandy was stating what I thought he was stating, he's absolutely owed the benefit of the doubt.
Spent the last hour going over a few other posts he's made (the man is both pithy and verbose) and I think his use of reducto ad absurdem at times strikes me as a "when did you stop beating your wife?" sort of loaded question.
I think it it's an interpretation fault with me, and the reaction fault is mine as well. I apologize, Sandy - you deserve better and you'll get it.
Thanks for the call to reason, ghost. We'll see if we can do more baseball with less drama.
~G