Add new comment

1

It's not a "hey, Pujols is playing first so you need to play somewhere else" situation. Kennedy is not Pujols, and he's not in next year's plans.  He can move. No, he hasn't played LF in the bigs.  Neither has Ackley. Ackley is a CF who blew his arm out, moved to 1B, then back to CF for the AFL for us, then to 2B.  And now you want him to play LF because we're stupid and don't have a LF worth anything?He's your #1 hitting prospect.  If you have Russ Branyan at 1B and Justin Smoak coming up, you don't move Smoak to DH for a year because Branyan is blocking him.  Branyan moves.Kennedy should move. The Mariners seem as clear about this as you are, G...Including your question, 'what does that mean, that they're "considering" ' Ackley in LF?'  :- )Couldn't agree more.  You're not going to disrupt your franchise commodity over your mid-30's invitee.............One question.  No interest in retaining Kennedy for '12?

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.