Add new comment

1

I am almost always opposed to a rent-a-bat situation. I'm not sure they are that great bets.   Luke Scott's name has been tossed around...Man he's a less than .260 hitter...lifetime, I think.
I sure as rain don't give up any kind of a prospect for a Luke Scott.
Today we really saw the line-up for the near future...or close to it. I think this lineup will score runs.
We have just had three consecutive all-world starting performance by three guys not named Larry Fernandez.  Trust in the arms.  Sit Figgins.  Get one more reliever rather than a Luke Scott.
If you could move Cust for something else that could play 3B or LF....I could live with that.  But who's making that trade?
This is an interesting place....but I'm not trading a future player for a rent a mediocre bat.
Carp and Halman are Luke Scott.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.