1
(or is that an antiquado expresione...)
Given those two (probably true) premises, the conclusion follows:
P1 - the M's need to select one of the available offensive players
P2 - the available offensive players ain't that overwhelming
C - in the M's context, a Rasmus trade would have been appealing relative to the choices
/cosign
But... could be that premise 2 is shakier than we think...