Add new comment

Taro...now first, I find it funny that you're making me stake out a position on a player I am moderately-warm on but by no means blazingly-hot in support of, but this line of thinking doesn't make any sense.
Look, I get that more Ks = more risk of failure.  So does terrible defense.  If you did this chart for great defender ---> terrible defender it would look much the same, I would think.  The great defensive guys fail only half the time, the terrible defenders fail more. 
Why?  Because being a great defender means your bat doesn't have to be as good.  You have more opportunities for success. If you're The Wizard of Oz nobody cares that you can't hit your way out of a paper bag.  If Ozzie was your 1B you'd fire him after a hundred at-bats.  Does it mean you NEVER take a risk on a defense-challenged bat?  Heck no.  You just make sure that the greatness with the stick outweighs the risk of the bad defense by enough.
Defense-challenged bats have to hit A LOT to stick in the bigs.  How does that apply to high-K bats?
Well as you illustrated, most of them happen to play BAT positions.  So if they can't thump enough for a corner, they're done for their careers. Slap hitters who don't strike out play other positions on the diamond where they don't have to carry as much offensive weight.
Robinson plays a glove position.  He doesn't have to hit like most of the High-K, corner-power-required guys would to be a success, so the Chart of Failure doesn't apply to him in the same way it does most of its constituents.  If Robinson "only" hit like Wily Mo Pena or Russ Branyan he'd be an all-star in center field.  He doesn't have to clear the same bar that the corner guys do with his offense.
.250/.310/.440 from Trayvon and he's a fixture in the lineup.  Get that from Branyan and he's out of a job. I'd love to see this chart broken out by position so we could see how any glove-position hitters fared in their transition with high Ks versus corner guys.
It's not as simple as "this good, that bad."  Ks at this rate IS bad, but we don't need him to post an .850 OPS to have value.  We didn't trade for a 1B with this K rate - if we did, I'd need him to hit like Adam Dunn.  If Tayvon gives me an Adam Dunn performance he's gonna be a HOFer.
One piece of information is very helpful for determining some things, but not everything, m'man.  Like I said, given Ichiro or Edgar, or Trayvon or Francisco, I take the first group.  But of course I take the HOFers over the question marks.  If you could get Reggie Sanders in CF over Ichiro in RF, you might actually do better to take Reggie, as heretical as that might be.
And since nobody offered us an Ichiro it's not a stupid risk to try for Reggie, who would be just this side of Carlos Beltran as far as flat-out awesomeness in CF.
A risk yes, but I can't call it a stupid one, especially as most people are reluctant to give you a sure thing - they tend to keep those for themselves, if they even have any.  The Dodgers don't.  Neither do the Red Sox.  Now that Ackley's promoted there are just a handful in the entire minors that might qualify.
Have I mentioned that Denard Span is not a sure thing either?
~G