Add new comment

... except in the sense that Baldwin has come out of nowhere with the type of early impact that suggests staying power.
Stylistically, no, two wideouts couldn't be more dissimilar than Baldwin and Largent.
At SSI, it's important to make sure that you understand an author's position before rebuffing it.  This isn't a typical sports chat board; we discuss sports topics thoughtfully and with respect for alternative viewpoints.
If I were annoyed at the presumption, I'd point out that two wideouts couldn't be more dissimilar than Welker and Baldwin, either; Welker runs a 4.7 forty and, though small, plays like a big receiver, almost a tight end.  Baldwin doesn't play like a big receiver, not at all.
But I'm not annoyed, so I won't point that out.