Add new comment

One thing:  I would challenge you to re-think your 4th and 5th paragraphs, LR.  
In the 4th paragraph, you declare your own confident belief as to what the Almighty would choose to do.  (You are sure that He would tolerate casual and thoughtless use of 'holy' ideas - which happens to be the classical definition of profanity.)
You are confident that any alternative view of God's likely behavior is "silly."
And in the 5th paragraph, you call it arrogant to have beliefs as to what the Almighty would choose to do!
..........
Mojician was not dogmatically claiming to speak inerrantly on God's behalf.  He was tentatively, respectfully, and with an air of open-mindedness --- > offering his own (negotiable) beliefs on the subject.  
May I politely note that your theology seems less negotiable, and more self-assured, than his?  ;- )