Add new comment

All we know is that they shut him down early and did so to reduce his innings pitched. So he isn't a point in favor of giving Ramirez 225 innings at age 22. Lincecum didn't reach that point until he was 24.
And what about the issue of risk versus reward? Is that extra 50 innings as a starter that first MLB season really worth the chance of losing a guy for a year and a half? If you were the GM of a major league team, would you really expect all your 22 year old pitchers to throw 225 innings and only reduce their workload if they showed fatigue?
What I am getting at is that while most pitchers might be able to handle 200+ innings at an early age, you and I don't know that. Since teams can't know what a pitchers limit is ahead of time, they have to decide ahead of time how they are going to handle him. And in this day and age they aren't going to push a guy until he breaks like they used to. They are going to play it safe and take stepped approach in ramping up his innings. I think that is perfectly reasonable because the reduction in innings at the major league level isn't that big of deal (it's usually only one season that is significantly managed) while an injury is often a huge deal.