1
I think there's the perception that a lot of his value will come from "intangibles" and the like. So there could be a lot of variation. Some will value that he'll be perceived as an advanced college guy (unlike, say, Starling), but he's also not perceived as a monster talent (unlike, say, Starling).
I'd guess he'll be in most Top 100, but in the lower 50, partially since most considered 2012 to be a "weak" draft at the top.