Add new comment

1

No one, I think, least of all me, is advocating that we "dump" Ackley. I think he has a lot of value, for the reasons listed in these comments. Which means other GMs think he has value also.
The question is, does Paxton+Ackley bring you back something better than Paxton+Franklin?
As to Mat's point, sure we don't know Ackley's future... But this is true of any prospect. Remember when Reed was a can't miss prospect?

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.