Add new comment

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1601289-trade-rumors-mariners-on-verg...
Aaron Harang?
If this is true then all Mariner FO/management perspective is in shambles. Just 10 days ago (or so) we let Garland go because we were convinced we had better options. In two starts by Maurer and two starts by Beavan we've punted on that strategy completely.
With ERam and (seemingly) Hultzen soon to be ready, we're actually going to trade a MiLB pitcher for Harang? Then what in the heck was letting Garland go all about? Did we expect Maurer to be Tom Seaver out of the gate? Beavan is a well understood commodity. What could the FO/management have NOT understood about him?
Harang is a 1.4 WHIP who might top out at 100 ERA+. Holy crud, we just gave that away for free in Garland.
Can this possibly be about grizzled veteranness? If so, I say EGAD!
I've tried hard to believe there is a plan. I'll give that up if this happens.
I would rather see 6 Noesi starts than this.
I-AM-AT-A-LOSS-FOR-WORDS!
Just say NO Z!
moe
PS: http://www.examiner.com/article/michael-saunders-injury-update-saunders-...
If we see 15 days of Endy Chavez, there will be no words to explain my growing sense of doom, in regards to the FO.
In light of the Harang thing, we will probably send Thames back to Toronto just so we can get Casper Wells back.
Or maybe we will just resign Figgy? That would be totally symmetrical, wouldn't it.
Sigh.....sigh.....sigh