Add new comment

1

Originally I has said that Taylor would be trade bait, but if he's another Miller, then you have an interesting situation. You can't get a boomer for Taylor alone....so why not keep him.
A Taylor-Miller-Franklin-Seager IF would be incredibly flexable (simply add a back-up 1B) and pretty good. I can't imagine that Seager wouldn't be a terrific 1B in double time, probably a spring training.
I'm not advocating, mind you, as we haven't even seen Taylor in AAA.....but just suggesting an interesting availability.
He's the type of guy that Z seems to get right.
http://mlb.mlb.com/team/player.jsp?player_id=621035&c_id=sea#gameType='S'&sectionType=career&statType=1&season=2013&level='ALL'
moe

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.