Add new comment

1
Steen.'s picture

My first impression was that his argument compared to his very well documented world view and values was cynical and disingenuous. I wasn't saying it for effect or to offend, I used those words because there aren't a slew of good alternatives that don't involve dancing around the actual meaning. There's polite and there's treating your treating your reader like a child, I didn't want to do the latter. I felt that would be more likely to offend, and Doc takes a skeptical view of PC'ness and effete liberals, i figured he and to a lesser extent his audience could handle the directness.
"Semantics and Silly Words" was a just something to put in the title and more a comment on the subject of my post not his. What looks like malice is just OCD for alliteration.
I gotta say for a site that leans away from the delicate liberal worldview it seems odd to see my words finely parsed so as to find things to get offended about. Next thing I know someone is going to start hating on old rich, white guys. ; )
Cheers

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.