Not too keen on Mr. Aardsma eh Doc?
I would agree. His shelf life would appear to be limited unless he develops another pitch. I guess he throws a split, right? Not all that great and a true show-me pitch. Let's not forget that this really was his first full trip around the league. If he could get through this next year, I'd be more of a believer. With how the team is looking, (and I'm excited to be down to quibbling over one more bat) there's a bit more pressure on his spot.
I think that your on to something regarding his arm action. A bit of a catchers throw making the ball tough to track. Long ago, I pitched on a team with a kid who could throw about 88mph. His velocity was middling for our team but his SO totals led the team. He also didn't have a secondary pitch. Being a failed catcher (I was a better hitter than him) he wanted to keep going. We did have a tough time helping him develop secondary stuff and I think that his arm action contributed to it.
In the end though, he got deeper into the minor leagues than anyone else on our staff, so he must have known something.
Here is an article by Carson Cistulli, following Matt Hanna, in which he finds that you can identify high-K, dominating pitchers more easily by looking for pitchers who can induce fishing outside the strike zone.
As Jeff Sullivan has emphasized, K/9 can be predicted from swinging-strike percentage. (Don't get carried away; you can predict a hitter's AVG too, from his K rate, but it's not an absolute.)
In essence, Hanna found that he could better predict "Expected Strikeout Percentage" by weighting "fishing" strikes against "in the zone" strikes.
A pitcher is doing better, if he can induce batters to fish for pitches outside the zone, than if he can throw a few balls by hitters. Part of this, I would say, is because nobody can consistently throw balls by major league hitters. But some pitchers can force "confused" hitters to swing at the wrong pitches.
...........
That's counter to Carson's intuition, as he commendably admits, that the great pitchers would be throwing the ball by hitters in the zone.
Is that what you would guess? That the Lincecums and Big Units and Bedards of the game, rack up 10 K's by beating hitters fair and square?
Or would you guess that K's occur because hitters are confused?
............
It's been a Bill James posit, since the 1980's, that you do not beat major league hitters by challenging them. You beat them by getting them to swing at fastballs outside the strike zone, or by getting them out in front of breaking pitches.
So Hanna's find is very pleasant from Dr D's standpoint. Hitting is timing, said Teddy Ballgame. Pitching is upsetting timing.
.
=== Deconstructing David, Dept. ===
The punch line: Aardsma is a pitcher who throws the ball by hitters inside the zone.
Aardsma had the #5 swing-and-miss rate in all the majors for pitches thrown inside the strike zone. Go to fangraphs.com > leaders > pitchers > relievers > plate discipline > Z Contact %.
That is consistent with what the eyes report -- that in 2009, Aardsma threw the ball by hitters, macho-against-macho, here it is hit it. Better than practically any pitcher in baseball.
.
=== Power vs. Power Dept. ===
Aardsma's ability to seduce batters into fishing for balls they couldn't reach? He was about average there, assuming that they swung. Batters rarely swung at Aardsma pitches outside the zone, but assuming that they did, they made contact normally.
So, there's one more thing that makes Aardsma a thrilling reliever. Here it comes. Let's see you do something with it.
This doesn't make me nervous that Aardsma will stop striking people out, but it does ratchet my HR nervousness even higher. He's not fooling anybody. He's just beating them, so far.
.
=== Fire and Ice Dept. ===
Brandon League, by the way, induces far more swings outside the strike zone than most pitchers, and when they do swing, they miss it a lot.
That's a tough doubleheader. Batters know they can't touch his changeup. They go up there telling themselves to lay off it. Then League throws it down, out of the zone, and they fish anyway.
League might throw 96-98 mph, but his fastball is nothing compared to his changeup. A pitch run value of 5 is sort of like a batting average of .472.
Cheers,
Dr D
Comments
Where would the BB's go?
He got them under control in 2009, primarily by not trying to throw his slider or whatever that 84 mph thing is. Supposing he sharpened that up, I'd bet you a quarter that he'd immediately start walking guys...
................
From playing roto, I am used to "value" white-knuckle closers :- ) and have no problem riding the Bobby Jenkses and Bob Wickmans of the game for a coupla months of saves. But I don't have to sit in the dugout when my roto closers blow saves...
................
Yeah. I'm a big believer in short-arm deliveries, provided a pitcher can make it work. More deception. It robs velo, but once in a while you find a short-arm guy who can put hair on it, and then you've got an Aardsma fastball.
I realize that Aardsma does extend his elbow a fair amount on the backstroke, but IMHO it's a variation of the behind-the-ear, max-effort syndrome...
If Aardsma were behind the plate throwing those laser beams down to 2B, y0u'd be hearing no complaints from me :- ) Didn't occur to me, until you just said it, how much better-suited some pitchers' motions would be from backstop... compact backstroke , crazy max effort, big followthru... Maybe we could get the DA a catcher's mask to pitch with?
...that would be pretty similar to the gladiator helmets. :)
I think Aardsma is pretty similar to Putz at this point...which means his shelf life is similarly short.
Maybe our catchers could wear Sparta headgear?
Aardsma is definetly a sell-high. Is anyone buying though? Thats my main concern... I'm sure Z is actively shopping him.
Their pen is still pretty thin.
Think maybe we could deal Saunders and Aardsma for (say) Shane Victorino and change?
Just spoiling here...there aren't that many closer options left on the market any more...most of them have already landed somewhere. Which contending teams still need power relievers?
If we could pull another Putz deal and then use some of our existing depth to acquire a slugger...I would be exceedingly happy.