Marco Gonzalez Groks
the balance sheet

.

CAVEATS and QUID PRO QUO's Dept.

The Mainframe would like to have this trade back.  We're not trying to grovel a paper trade victory here.

.

ZOOM ZOOM Dept.

Billy Zoom nailed a prediction on a Cards-or-Dodgers ML ready starter for an M's outfielder.  That, amigos, is quite a call.  Bat571 seems to have been with him; check me on that because nothing against Bat but my memory is worthless.  :- )

Neither Zoom or Dipoto are selling Gonzalez as an elite prospect; Dipoto withheld his "premium prospects" exactly because he didn't get the young TOR he craved.  But Zoom is willing to chime in towards Gonzalez' upside, predicting not only success but an actual #2 starter within 2 years.  

Which would be something because Dipoto emphasized Marco's "preparation and readiness" for 2017.  A 100+ ERA would indeed help the club muchly if it is out of the #5 slot.

.

DENIZENS

... Have done a great job in registering their camera angles on Marco, Polo!  Marco ...  Here are the main Frame takeaways on the situation:

.

BAD = what was it, our #2 for their #18.  Very nice.  What a farm system.  (Though I think Tank is now their #4 and Marco our #7.  There is a Beltway factor on the rankings.)

.

BAD = It is up to this crew now.  Needed some wind in the sails for a roster that has been grinding manfully.  (But see Paul Silvi's opinion that it actually does boost the clubhouse.)

.

BAD = Marco's elbow problems.  It's problematic to trade hitting for pitching even if there are no injury questions pending.

.

GOOD = The Mariners' outfield situation is Dipoto's pride and joy and it should be.  Those four young hosses stay.  4-to-make-3 is exponentially better than 3-to-make-3.  Several times we've gotten one of the OF's nicked up, or in a little slump, and we're still left with 3 starters we like, not 2.

Many have forgotten about Mitch Haniger but not me, gentlemen, not me.  Growing pains are part of it but this man is the real deal.

.

GOOD = Marco Gonzalez is a pull at the deck -- as was Tank O'Neill.  They're not married to Gonzalez.  And were they married to O'Neill?  Quite the opposite; he had a tough path into the lineup at all.  If Marco doesn't throw well, you can flush him.  The same was true of Tank!

It's important that Marco is not Wade Miley or Yovani Gallardo.  If he doesn't pitch good, fuhgeddaboudim.

.

GOOD = We keep Max Povse.  I'll take Povse's chances over Marco's right here, right now.  6 years of Povse for 1.5 years of a merely above-average relief pitcher, that would have been truly weird.

.

GOOD = Popups and lefty fly balls in Safeco with fleet jardineros.  Some wag on LL chimed in, "Dipoto thinks infield pops (weak contact) is the new market inefficiency," thinking of Moore and Marco.

.

GOOD = I do like the template Marco brings, the lefty straight changeup.

.

GOOD = The makeup is supposed to be really good.  Much of baseball is between the ears.  In projecting young prospects, poise is truly the "market inefficiency."  Even when makeup is not underrated, it's underrated.  See Hisashi Iwakuma, and the industry's early disdain for him, as exhibit A.

.

GOOD = see Greg Johns' and Bob Dutton's twitter feeds.  Their impression is quite a bit different from the Think Tank's.

.

DR'S R/X

You ask me, I un-do the deal.  As a casual observer here -- I have never even seen Gonzalez pitch -- the trade reminds me of when we had a hot commodity in Jarrod Washburn midseason, and took back ... a vanilla three-pitch lefty?  Scouts were going, "Luke French is just another dime-a-dozen lefty.  We offered them twice that."  Also, it's not like Jerry Dipoto is immune to bad deals.

But hey.  The bottom line is that this is a GM we are very lucky to have.  He pointed a finger at Tank O'Neill's future and said, "Not gonna happen."  He pointed a finger at Marco Gonzelez' future and said "That guy, he's going to help in the big leagues."  Neither judgment is unreasonable.  His judgments on Jean Segura, on Mitch Haniger, on Ben Gamel, on Edwin Diaz as a reliever, and other judgments, showed some good visualization.

Worth consideration is the fact that --- >  Jerry Dipoto likes Marco Gonzalez and wasn't so crazy about Tyler O'Neill.

BABVA,

Jeff

Blog: 

Comments

1

but the universal value of SP vs. OF (especially in our current situation with a glut of young, capable OF) is never to be ignored in trades of this type.  Yes, pitchers are more volatile and injury-prone than position players who've already cleared the high minors, but in the end it's easier to trade off surplus pitching than it is to trade off surplus OF's.

Stockpiling SP is therefore never a terrible idea in principle, but I *still* dislike getting the 'worse' player in the deal, regardless of system fit.

2

I think we might be overestimating O'Neill's position on the depth chart.  

Yes, he's now holding his own at AAA at age 22, so no question, his career is all ahead of him.  But certainly he's not going to threaten the current quartet in the outfield.  If Dyson leaves after this year, then Tank moves up a slot, but Powell is still ahead of him.    

But in my mind, DiPoto still has one more guy after that--Doc's favorite, Leonis.  He and Tank have identical OPS this year...Martin leads the PCL in stolen bases, and he can...ahem...go get em in the outfield better than Tank.  

DiPoto is satisfied with Zunino's production behind the plate becase of what he brings in terms of defense and handling the staff.  But in the outfield, Tank just does not fit DiPoto's favored profile.  I wish him well, but somehow he's going to have to figure out how to turn a 30%+ K rate in AAA into something passable in the majors...against much better pitching.

So...I like the deal.  

3

does Gonzales look like a safer bet than O'Neill, he also looks a bit more likely to be a successful SP than Moore.

Are you concerned about how often hitters get the ball in the air vs. Moore Doc? His pattern through the minors was GO/AO well below 1.00 at every level. At least he won't be walking guys and the XBH might not do much damage?

4

If you look at his Brooks Baseball player card, it looks as though he was still sorting out his release point in '14. As he did, his velocity crept up. The Cardinals used him against the Dodgers and Giants in that post-season, so somebody saw something.

So, we got a TJ-recovering southpaw who was considered a top prospect when his release point was all over the place. We gave up a guy who *might* become a regular OF, but also might be the next Rob Deer. To me, that isn't that bad a trade when the inventories of the two teams are considered.

Marco is just getting to the point where TJ guys are getting their feel and velocity in hand. He didn't pitch in April, and didn't have a good May. Since June 18th, when the Cards sent him back to Memphis after using him in a double-header:  5G, 5W, 32IP, 34K, 7BB, 7R/ER, 22Hits,  2HR, 3HBP. That looks to me like he's coming around and Jerry Dipoto said "NOW!" -----> 34 Ks and 7 BBs in 32 IP -- is that controlling the zone?  22 Hits in 32 IP --- is that limiting damage?

I'm looking forward to a stop for Marco in the Lance Painter LH Pitcher Performance Tweak Shop. Then a few turns as a Rainier getting his muscle memory and let's see how he does.

In the 2014 post-season, he made some pretty good Dodger hitters sit down, then didn't do quite as well in his 3rd game against the Giants. But he pitched in 5 games without getting scored on, before the Giants scored 3 on a hit and a walk in the 6th postseason game he pitched - and that just over a year after pitching for Gonzaga. There's some skill and moxie there - I guess that's what I saw that I really like: the moxie to simply go at guys even knowing you're overmatched. Do we have any other pitchers who are 2-1 in postseason play?

Maybe his career will be like Bob Wolcott with only a few successful games, but some early post-season success to look back on. My bet is we have 2 VERY heady #3-4 pitchers, one right, one left, to feed into the mix going forward. And they'll learn from their mistakes going forward. Will he take as long as Jamie Moyer to jell? Obviously I hope not. Will he be a 20-game winner? Probably more like 14-8. But if both Marco and Moore develop to that point behind Paxton and Felix - well, that's 10-12 games over .500 right there.

We may not get to the Promised Land this year. But Dipoto has acquired a goodly amount of talent capable of taking us there.

5

M's not wanting to trade the front 4, so O'Neill's value is pushed down.

I dunno why you wouldn't just stick him at 1B or something stupid like that in AAA tho.

With Valencia on a 1 year, it would look logical.

8
The Other Billy Zoom's picture

Increasing drum beating in St. Loo that a DePoet type-move was in mind for their jump for O'Neill.

Some think he will be dealt in a very big deal for Osuna or Stanton from Miami, with one of their top 3, and perhaps a hot hot youngun arm like Fernandez if Cards close in on Brewers and Cubs for Division crown.

So Tank could get tanked this week.

Hope Moe gets to see Gonzales at noon today in Tacoma.

zoom

Add comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.