Men

Manual only: 
Profile count: 
7

M's 3, Tigers 2 - Batting Orders continued

Ichiro caught this one.

 ..............................

=== Ichiro from leadoff to #3 ===

We wrote an article or ten this winter and spring, gingerly predicting that Ichiro would benefit from having men on base in front of him.  He seems to feel more responsibility to the team when hitting in the middle of rallies, and less responsibility toward his 200-hit geas. 

Ichiro had 0.2 WAR at the finish of the 2011 season; he's got 1.3 WAR so far this season, with 19% of the schedule completed, leaving him on pace for 6.8 WAR.  He is totally rejuvenated - Dr. Grumpy's suggestion that Ichiro's digestive health sapped him in 2011 makes sense, as always.  If you watched highlights from various seasons during his career you wouldn't be able to tell him now from any other year, except he's hitting the ball in the air more.

It's possible that Ichiro is playing so well because the team is better, as opposed to his hitting in the middle of rallies.  It's possible that he's playing well 70% because of his batting order slot, and 30% because the offense is better.  Ichiro himself went home and thought about the #3 slot all winter, going so far as to try to change his swing.  It's no accident that his flyball ratio is way up.  

You might think that it's better not to overemphasize batting order; that's fine.  You can't reasonably scoff at the idea that batting orders matter:  Ichiro thinks it matters, a ton.  Ichiro is as smart as you are, whoever you are, up to and including James and Hawking*, and as a completely separate issue, he knows hitting better than you do, up to and including Ted Williams.  If THAT guy thinks batting order is a huge deal, we might want to re-think.  Have you been in a batting order?

..........

League in hitters' counts: 94 fastballs, 5 splitters

 ...............

Last May we offered an analysis of League's Sasaki Syndrome.  League replied, in the papers, that if he executed his game it shouldn't matter that hitters know what's coming.  

Okay, maybe, but this year it has been mattering more and more.  League now has 7 K and 5 BB in 13 innings.  There is no such thing as a closer who sustains success on those ratios.  You won't find any, because there aren't any.  Closers have to have good K/BB ratios.  'cause they have to pitch good, and pitching good creates high K/BB ratios.

.

=== 2012 To Date ===

Here are League's pitch tendencies so far in 2012, counting Monday's blown save:

  Fastballs Splitters
0-0 count 46 4
1-0 18 1
2-0 5 0
3-0 1 0
3-1 7 0
3-2 7 0
2-1 10 0
Total 94 5

League throws 25% splitters overall - absolutely none in hitter's counts, and about 50-50 when he's in the driver's seat.  

With the above tendencies, League might as well be tipping his pitches.  What difference would it make if League pushed his elbow out on the forkballs and didn't do so on fastballs?  On 2-1, the batter is no less aware of the fastball now, than he would be with a "tell."

Why Does BABIP Work?

Why is it that 30% of all batted balls go for base hits, and it is even true that no individual hitter sustains a BABIP outside the 25-35% range?

What is it in the nature of a baseball game that causes 25-35% of batted balls to hit the ground and fall for base hits?  If we could grasp that, we could grasp why a 25% line drive rate, with a .250 BABIP, mean bad luck, even over the course of 30 at-bats.  Here's a hint:  would as many balls fall into the sides of this Pachinko machine as would fall into the middle?  Why or why not?

 ............

If you dropped 30 balls down a Pascal board, and they all fell into the two left receptacles, you'd say "ah, that's bad luck."  And any other explanation would be incorrect.

The thing is, you have to first thoroughly absorb WHY a ball, coming off a hitter's bat, is a Pascal's Triangle situation.  Does a hitter's bat make contact 1/8 inch higher, or lower, because he meant for it to do so?  

Does BABIP actually work?

.

=== Crystal Ball Dept. ===

BABIP actually does work, and it works always.  (Within a certain range.)  BABIP always works just like it always works that Mark Reynolds never leads the league in strikeouts and batting average at the same time.  It's not a statistical trick; it's the fabric of the reality out there.

Tom Wilhelmsen is Miscast as a Reliever

 ..................

Q.  What happened out there in the 8th today?

A.  Two runs up, Wilhelmsen gave up a seeing-eye ground ball to Miguel Cabrera.  Then Prince Fielder viciously turned around a 96 fastball for a line-drive single, two (plodding) runners on, nobody out.

Wilhelmsen, grinding, missed two curve balls to Delmon Young - one he yanked low and wide into the dirt, and the other missed badly.  This is the 3rd batter, now, and Wilhelmsen wasn't yet in his groove.  He did manage to scuffle a hard-hit fly ball out.

He got behind Peralta 2-0 ... tying runs on, now.  He ain't tryin' to miss.  He just missin'.  This is the 4th hitter in.  In the 8th, you don't have four hitters to get loose, do you understand me?   On the 3-1 pitch, Wilhelmsen desperately aimed 97 MPH (!) right down the middle, which it wasn't, but Peralta fouled it off.

***CLICK***

That was the visual TW needed.  He smiled.  On 3-2, he cracked off an overhand curve that has my eyes tearing as I remember it.  The snap of the wrist was epic.  Later Blowers would say admiringly, "He just trusts the ump to make that call."  The ball bisected the plate, dropping down out of the sky to finish exactly at the knees.  I'd call it a Bert Blyleven curve ball, if Bert Blyleven ever threw a power curve like that.*

........

Happily, Tom fired three curve balls to Alex Avila, THE left hand All-Star Alex Avila, and ratcheted the count to 2-2.  By the time he fired a 95-MPH thunderbolt in for strike three, it looked 115 MPH.  Would you please go look at this swing.  About eight times.

ChiSox 7, M's 3

 ..............

=== Hector Noesi ===

G-Money has taken to providing postgames that echo my own observations with 96.37% consistency.  Do you think he should be more worried, or me?  Here is his own mini-postgame.  This will apparently serve as the expanded version.  You're a sports fan, so you're good with replays.  Question is whether you want fourteen replays of Adam Dunn's home runs.

Montero called for the same stripped-down Max Scherzer style attack game that he did last time around.  Fully 40 of 58 pitches were fastballs, and the rest* were changeups.  Noesi demonstrated that, as of April 2012, this is a bit much to ask also.  Montero's pitch call, and Noesi's result, is analogous to giving Tim Tebow, or Andrew Luck, a 12-play arm wrap ... and then watching the QB turn the wrong way in the backfield half the time, and get decapitated for six sacks and four picks.

If you don't shed the dude for anything else, shed him for the tempo.  C'mon.  It's fastballs low and away every pitch.  What is with the 30-second internal dialogue when it's the pitch he threw at 11 years old?  He's standing there thinking, "Oh, man.  This is going to be SOOOOooooooo fun that I just need to savor the moment ooonnnnnne more second."

...........

Wedge took his own turn in decapitating Noesi, yanking him in the 2nd inning with the bases empty, giving him no opportunity to finish on a stronger note.  This could be a presage to a role change.

M's Line Drive Rate: .243. Their BABIP: .265. Usual difference: 100.

 ............

In the American League in 2011, you could project a team's BABIP -- its batting average on balls in play, that is, its AVG on everything except HR's, BB's, and K's, i.e., its AVG on balls that fielders had a chance to make a play on -- by adding 100 points to its line drive percentage.  The league hit 19.6% line drives, and its BABIP was .295.  

Fielders get to 70% of balls hit into fair play.  Think about it and you'll see why this figure couldn't possibly be 90% or 50%.  The earth is 70% covered by water, and the baseball field is 70% covered by defensive players.

This .300 AVG on balls in play is driven by the fact that ML teams hit 20% line drives.  A team that hit nothing but screaming line drives would see about 75% of them go for base hits.  Also known as Kevin Millwood Against Lefty Hitters The Other Day.

...........

This can range up and down a bit.  The A's, playing in their ballpark, added only 75 BABIP points to their line drive percentage in 2011 -- their LD's were 20.8%, and their BABIP .283.  Only 75 points.  That was the lowest gap in the league.  

The feeble 2011 Mariners, playing in a bad park for BABIP and playing with bad hitters for generating offense of any kind, had 18.6% line drives and a .283 BABIP.  The horrible offensive production still generated the normal 97-point gap between LD's and BABIP.

The woeful 2010 Mariners, the team that scored 513 runs, setting a DH-era record and in fact emulating a 1900's deadball offense, still had the usual 106-point gap.  They hit 17.6% line drives but posted a .282 BABIP.

Some teams, of course, do better than that 10% gap.  Last year, the Cardinals had a teamwide .337 BABIP, even with pitchers batting, and that was good for a 112-point difference.  The Astros had a 117-point gap.  etc.

.... Mariners 5. (and Saunders' travails)

Ichiro's relief at finally being caught by the howling mob, toward the end of the M's 513-run season?  Nah, he's just getting kaizen service at the Nippon TowerMall Nike shop

   .............

=== Pitch of the Game ===

Bottom of the 5th, and the A's have just come back to tie it 3-3.  John sez to me, sure would be nice to answer immediately.  That's what the Rangers would do...

Ryan flies out.  Figgins walks on four pitches.  Dustin Ackley gets on base, courtesy that 60-foot backhand "flip" by a feebleminded Jemile Weeks.   Two on, one out, your #3 hitter up.

Ichiro takes a fastball for an 0-1 count and here comes the pitch of Sunday's baseball game.  Ready?  Ready? ... wait for it ...

Graham Godfrey fires a "ladder" fastball, down the middle, just a little too high.  The most tempting pitch in baseball.  .... Ichiro jumps at it, takes a 1/4 swing, and then ......... juuuuuuust holds up.  Check swing.

The umpire takes a long look and then ... ball one.  

The count will not be 0-2, baseball's equivalent of rotting flesh disease.  Or a torn ACL on the at-bat.  Or pick your metaphor.  The count will be 1-1.  Godfrey has to try a changeup, going 2-1, and on pitch four, Ichiro vaporizes an inside fastball down into the RF corner.  That's the ballgame.

...

This March, we debated whether Ichiro's #3 spot in the batting order would produce a tightened strike zone and a zippier swing.  Here is the tale of the tape:  Ichiro's Outside Zone Swing % remains ultra-low, 18%, and his SwStr% simply doesn't exist.

His line drives are by far the highest of his career, 25%, and he's hitting very few grounders.  That may be a bad thing in isolation, but there is no doubt that Ichiro is approaching the game differently.  That's a fact.

.... Rangers 3

 ...............

Q.  How did Millwood do it?

A.  With guts and guile, knowledge of the hitters.  With a rawhide-leather elbow ligament that can still cut the fastball gloveside after 37 years (counting from the first time he chucked a rubber ducky back out of his crib).  And with a daring game plan to take the Rangers up in the strike zone, tempting them to go after pitches juuuuuuust a little too high to get on top of.

.

Q.  He took the Rangers UP in the zone?  In Texas?  A better strategy would be to flush his wallet down the toilet.

A.  Especially Beltre, but really all (or most) of them.  Dig the location chart:

That old man's still got a lot of hair on that fastball.  And you remember the scenes in Wild Bill, the Jeff Bridges one, where he wades into saloons and starts blazin' away against nine guys?  You just saw the AL West metaphor for it.

.

Q.  He can still cut the fastball, y'say.

How about the bullpen? Is IT "All In"?

 .............

It ain't easy, looking at a Yahoo.com roto base of pitchers, to suggest specific relief pitchers that --- > Jack Zduriencik could target for termination.  

J.P. Howell is a pending FA, fans 10 per game in setup, and Tampa ain't going to be able to pay a setup man $12-20M for 3-4 years.  (By way of comparison, ChiSox setup man Matt Thornton just signed for $6M per year, times 3 years.)

You hear about the Mariners trading Brandon League this year:  that's because League is a pending FA, an MLB Closer(TM), and is looking at $10M+ per year this winter.  You deal him or lose him for nothing.  Same with Tampa Bay's pending-FA relief men, like Howell.  

J.J. Putz had a big year closing for Arizona and he will be an FA.  He had an elbow flareup last summer.  What would you think of him as a rent-an-ace-reliever for one year?

Also pitching for the Rays is Kyle Farnsworth, who fanned 8.0 men last year, walked 1.9, and is a free agent this winter.  Guys like that.  Somebody with the Mariners will have a nice relief pitchers spreadsheet that they can sort by (1) CMD ratio, (2) service time, and (3) home teams' willingness to deal.

.

Q.  How about giving these guys a chance, first?  One game doesn't prove that Kelley and Sherrill can't pitch.

A.  It's like with Chone Figgins.  It wasn't the two games in Tokyo, dude.  The two games merely underlined what we already feared.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Men