Oakland

Location Type: 
City
Profile count: 
16 131

R-E-S-P-E-C-T Dept: Killer Instinct

 .............

Baker, coming from the East Coast, has a macro sense for what some ballclubs are up to when they say, "We'll put together a competitive team and offer a nice family night at the ballpark."  

Baker has seen East Coast teams that thirst to win, and he has seen midmarket team that "manage expectations."  He calls baloney on it.  So do I, and have since July 2011.  If you, Gentle Reader, are oblivious to the fact that many sports CEO's want to play .500, make money, and sit in the luxury boxes getting fawned over ... you better axs somebody.

This macro industry problem is real, and it can't be waved off so easily.  Particularly not by a non-athlete smugly asserting that there is no such thing as sports psychology.  

The moral issue arises if and when an MLB team overtly sells a pennant race - and covertly does not intend to offer one.

Dr. D, with his immersion in 1945-1975 Soviet chess and olympics training, is completely convinced that there is such a thing as sports psychology.  But that's not the point.  The point is that everybody in baseball, especially everybody who's ever won in baseball, will tell you that.

Baker tells you that, too.  Laugh if you want.  Guess who else you're laughing at, at the same time?  Jack Zduriencik.  Don't think he doesn't wince at the naivete when he reads it online.

POTD Josh Willingham

 ............

Spec links us to a Jack Zduriencik card-flash off the bottom of the deck:  Z wants "an impact bat," whether "by free agency or trade."

Does Josh Willingham float your boat?  As you can see from the photo, he's comin' at you with a certain amount of mystery associated.

Lead off the discussion with his .360 OBP and .475 SLG "like clockwork," claims Spec.  He's right.

.

=== Crib Notes of the Day ===

1.  At 5.7 runs per 27 outs last year, 6.2 career (in the NL), Willingham is an impact bat, barely.  But if it's an I/O grade, yes, Willingham is an impact bat.

Last year he had 29 homers and 98 RBI's.  What a shame for him that human beings were born with ten fingers.

To Rook or Not to Rook (the 2009 Oakland A's)

 ..............

By the time my man, your man, the San-Man was done taping incredulous caps and **!?!?$** marks onto his parcel-post delivery, "Is Z *really* THAT aggressive?!?" ... Dr D's roman candle was pleasantly lit.  

Wanna get serious, mate? :- )  Step up.

Ya, we know.  South'n man hopes Dr D will remember, South'n man don' need him aroun' anyhow.  

He remembers, he remembers.  But west of the Mississippi, it iss Heil der Bazeball-Reference kommissar.  Go for your (stats) luger, Freunde sind.

.......

::WWII stand-tall, straight-arm sight-fire::  

If you are looking for specific examples of major league GM's stuffing rookies into the same rotation together, you don't have to look far.  At SSI, we live to serve.

The 2009 Oakland A's handed the ball, out of spring training, to a couple of 21-year-old pure rookies.  These pitchers debut'ed together in the majors in Opening Week of 2009.  Those being Brett Anderson and Trevor Cahill.

That same 2009 A's team put Gio Gonzalez into the rotation, one month later, on May 3.  In arb-clock terms, this would be analogous* to the Mariners bringing Taijuan Walker up after a single month in AAA.

To Rook or Not to Rook (historical precedents)

 .................

Ay carumba, if 2006-11 can be considered history, anyway.

.

This isn't to say it's completely out of the question for Z to hopscotch one of these guys into the rotation.  But, three?!?  I don't see it happening.

Nah, Taijuan isn't pitching for a job in March.  Four rookies in three years, we sez, making two-at-once a logical necessity at some point.

Do teams put two rookies in the same starting rotation?  Is that the way they do bidness? .... we took a look at b-ref.com to look at some recent rookie SP combos.

.......

The 2009 Oakland A's we talked about to lead off.  Not only were Cahill and Anderson in the Opening Day rotation, but both were pure rookies, and both considerably younger than Hultzen and Paxton.

Not only were Cahill and Anderson in the Opening Day rotation, but Gio Gonzalez was there a month later, and Vin Mazzaro a month after that.

Winter 2011-12 -- The Bar in the AL West

 .... 

Q.  Okay, each year half the teams make the postseason with about +75 differential.  Does this mean that the 2012 Mariners are contenders if they hit +75?

A.  No.

For the Mariners, the target is more like +100.  Maybe even a bit more.

The AL Wild Card the last five years has been won by Boston, New York and once the Tigers, with run differentials of +140 to +190 runs every cotton-pickin', chicken-pluckin' year.  If you want to shoot for the wild card in the American League, you better pencil in 95 wins, bro'.

So the Mariners have to factor in the reality that the Wild Card is a no go, not unless they become a truly powerful team.  To win the AL Wild Card, you frequently have to be (pretty much) the 2nd-best team in baseball.

That ain't happenin'.  Not unless you got like three more Pinedas in the minor leagues somewhere.

....

Winter 2011-12 -- Less' Mess With Texas, Dept.

 ..... 

Q.  Is there any way to tell how good Texas will be in 2012?

A.  They racked up the 2011 bling with pitching, more so than with hitting.  Their ERA+ was 118.  The Rangers and Yankees were miiiiiiiiillles ahead of the only other two excellent pitching staffs, those being in Oakland and Anaheim.

All 5 of the Rangers' starters went 29-34 games, with great ERAs+ as a group.  And every single reliever was great.

If all five Rangers' starters are all unconscious in 2012, sure, you're talking about a +150 differential again, because their offense will hit.  But you go through that B-Ref.com almanac and you see pitching staffs drop off Y2.   

Could Colby Lewis and Alexi Ogando have sore arms, and Matt Harrison have an off year?  Happens all the time.

Hultzen's Chances = 80% (draft review 2)

 .... 

Draft review, continued

.

2002:  The laughingstock Pirates took Bryan Bullington 1-1, Bullington signed for a discounted bonus, and then the next several pitchers taken were HS kids -- no other college pitcher could even argue to be a 1-1.

It's hard to say whether to dismiss Pirate picks... it was a tricky draft.  All of the first 5 picks disappointed.

Still, Bullington was a (RHP) 3-pitch guy with a great K/BB in college.  We'll include him, since he was fairly comparable then to where Hultzen is now.

Jason Vargas' Universal Spiral

Spec sez,

How about this guy [as a candidate for 1H 2012].  In Sept.

5 GS, 31.2 IP, 2.84 ERA, 1.14 WHIP

0.3 HR/9, 2.6 BB/9, 7.7 K/9

It's Jason Vargas with "the twist."  I think he'll be cheaper than any FA, and if the the twist makes him a 7-K/9 lefty, then he's probably just as good.

Dr. D has been a fan of The Pitching Twist since this 1980's pitcher, who for 3-4 years was the only good pitcher the Seattle Mariners had.  Later, this pitcher proved to us that you could not only pitch well with the twist, but could also function as THE best pitcher in baseball.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Oakland