Add new comment

1

... and I hope to see you putting at least half your posts on the front page.  It's pretty silly for you to bury such info-taining material in monitor-long comments.  :- )
...............
I'll take the other side of the ping-pong table on this one, however, amigo...
If we were all playing in a roto league, and you, Grizzle and others reached a consensus that Brandon Morrow just isn't that valuable, I would respect that.
But the Tigers offered us Edwin Jackson for Brandon Morrow and change -- the reports were clear and source-varied on this one, including from the M's -- and Zduriencik validated this with the comment that he couldn't give up such colossal talent considering Jackson's service time.
Whether you're correct or not, whatever your arguments are, I think it's clear that the industry sees Morrow as a blue-chipper.
...................
I don't buy the idea that maybe Morrow had little market value, but DO think that your argument tells, in terms of our ranging Morrow against League.  :- )

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.