Add new comment

1

If one assumes significant plusses from Felix and Lee -- and an aggregate zero from every other pitcher combined, it's a winning season.
Of course, one of the variables missing is the 'scrub' replacements -- the Woodward, Hall, Quiroz, Shelton, Burke (etc.) random few dozen PAs (each) from emergency fill-ins, failed call-ups, etc.  And I'm grossly oversimplifying the pitching reality in my above paragraph.
But, all-in-all, I'd say Matt has done a very solid analytical job w/o a lot of homerism entering the picture.  Well done.  In the end, I would expect a projection of 85-ish wins from the current roster - which gives it the position to surprise (and win), or disappoint and slip to sub-.500, (depending on how things break). 
Who knows?  A Lopez/Kotchman++ for A.Gone/Tui in mid-season could change things the way Oakland used to bulk up for the dog days.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.