Justin Upton - Franchise Player?
Last year, #4 in Fangraphs trade value

.

Q.  Is Upton comparable in value to Giancarlo Stanton?  Suppose you could give two blue-chippers for Upton, or four for Stanton?

A.  No, no, no, NO.

The Yankees have a standing offer.  Any five (5) for Felix.  That's how I feel about Giancarlo Stanton.  (Although, coming from the Mariners, "any five" means something completely different than it means coming from New York.)

We're talking about Upton as a consolation prize.

.

Q.  Is he a settle?

A.  He's been a 5-6 WAR player twice in the last four years, and he's been a 3-WAR player twice.  He'd feel like a settle if you hadn't already acquired Kendrys Morales.

Adding bot Upton AND Morales, one right and one left, THAT's not much of a settle.  Both of those guys are legit MOTO hitters, and both have MVP-candidate upside, and both are looking very promising to hit that upside.

.

Q.  If Upton bounces back, is he a franchise player then?  Does he need to spike past 2009 and 2011?

A.  My big quibble with Upton is that he isn't a great offensive player, and hasn't been, even in his UP years.  Here, let's check his runs created per 27 outs:

Justin Upton RC/27 RBI R
2008 5.9 42 52
2009 7.2 86 84
2010 5.1 69 73
2011 7.2 88 105
2012 5.6 67 107

Compare Stanton, who at age 22 (and despite being an RBI man) already produced 8.2 runs per 27 outs.  Upton's RC/27 average 6.1 for his career, which might be fine if he got 110 RBI per year, but he's never even had 90 RBI.  Offensively, he's been as valuable as a fast Nick Swisher.  That's nothing to sneeze at, but it ain't Josh Hamilton, now is it.

Now, we put R up there to emphasize that Upton is a guy who does everything well.  He plays real good defense, and he runs the bases, and he's the kind of 5-tool WAR player that WAR was made for.  Upton isn't a WAR mirage; he's a guy you need WAR to appreciate.

If you were talking about Texas or the Angels ... they might view him as a franchise-type add.  If they're real bullish on the 5-6 WAR scenarios.

But the Mariners right now are looking for an offensive wrecking machine, a Josh Hamilton or Giancarlo Stanton, a straw that stirs.  In order to become that, Upton would need to step FORWARD even from his 2011 production.  He hasn't even really been that so far, in his best years.

Upton has been a fine player.  In 2009 and 2011 he's been an outstanding player.  He hasn't yet been a franchise player at the plate, not with 88 RBI being his career high.

.

Q.  He's signed cheap for three years.  Would you give Paxton and Franklin and goodies for him?

A.  Objectively speaking, you'd have to.  But I'd rather give twice that for Stanton.

Cheers,

Dr D

Comments

1

In the end, he's pretty...but not that pretty.
Paxton/Franklin plus another goodie is too steep for me.
Franklin and a reliever and something else not named "Big Three" or Romero and I'm with you.
Upton has 1534 "Away" plate appearance in his career, and 1496 "Home" ones. You can just as easily discount the home productivity as a fortunate fluke as you can the away ones as an unfortunate fluke.
He can play. But let's be careful about the cost....
Good stuff Doc,
moe

2

Absolutely, your comparison to Wells is reasonable, But Wells doesn't offer the same potential to morph into a game changing player before next season. The stunning speed off the bat on homers is what does it for me. There is a lot of potential, and hey, he has posted .901 OPS in Petco.

3
GLS's picture

I don't especially want to give up any of the big three. History tells us that all three (or four if you include Maurer) won't turn into TOR starters. It's highly likely that none of the three will turn into a TOR starter. And yet, I just have this feeling that we have something special happening down there. Billy Beane had faith in his guys and that worked out fairly well. Yeah, I know, it probably won't happen.
I suppose I'd do it though. In the end, rationality has to play some sort of role in this process and it's not like you're going to get the guy for nothing. I have to assume as well that Jack and Co. know which of the three to give up and which ones to keep.
So, presumably, we're talking a package of Walker OR Hultzen OR Paxton plus either Franklin, Romero, or Miller (hopefully only one of the three), plus something else - a 3 for 1 trade.
By the way, let's just go ahead and not give up Romero. Franklin, okay, especially considering his problems batting from the right side. Miller, okay, yeah, I'll go along with that. He has some sort of weird throwing motion that makes it unlikely he'll stick at short. But people are calling Romero a "pure hitter" and we don't have a ton of those guys.

4

He ain't very pretty compared to a Hamilton or Stanton ... /cosign Mo Dawgie...
What's your interpretation of his home/road splits?  Why do you suppose he's hit for so much less power on the road?  It isn't like he doesn't hit the ball hard.

5

You're perhaps being a little modest there GLS.
I think like 80% of 92+ MPH lefties *are* TOR's in the big leagues, so James Paxton is approximately one mechanical tweak away.
Taijuan Walker isn't a generic blue-chip pitching prospect; he's probably the best prospect the M's have had other than Felix, and isn't a long ways behind where Felix was at the same age.
Hultzen's got that ridiculous straight-change LHP template that seems almost destined to succeed.
..........
If we were talking just "three pitching prospects," then yeah, we'd be hoping for one to pan out.  But Gordon, with each of these guys, wouldn't you say it's harder to visualize failure than success?!  It's the failure scenario that's difficult to visualize.

6

Immature is probably too harsh... but it gets you in area.
There are many reports of JU not running plays out, complete losses on concentration on defense, and late night partying... Now, I am not looking for a choir boy, but when Kirk Gibson has not been able to change him enough to where the D Backs could evem think about keeping him... there is something wrong personality wise.
PASS PLEASE>
Now, maybe Wedge and Ibanez and Bay and a trade to Seattle are the tonic that fixes him... but I am not willing to give more than one of of top 10 prospects and fodder for Justin.

7

I kinda of understand why the D Backs want to get rid of JU.
But it makes ZERO sense for the M's to trade a bunch of prospects for Upton though, because of our current roster... and I am pretty sure the D Backs do not want or need our fringe / bench players back in the trade.
I mean look at our roster just on the 40 man:
OF - Saunders, Guti, Ibanez, Wells, Bay, Carp, Thames, Peguero, Morban, F. Martinez
1B - Smoak, Liddi, Catricala
DH - Morales, Montero
Trading for Upton means at least 3 of the above gets CUT for no return. Now maybe Peguero is worthless, but if you give up or don't have room for Wells, Carp, Catricala, Liddi, Thames, and etc.. that is POOR roster management... and this is NOT how Jack has ever worked in the past. Times change yes, and getting wins number 82 and up are harder, but this would be a major change for Jack and I do not see it.
Again, as Moe and I have gone round and round with before... Carp maybe gone already unless there is an injury. The Big Blog says Wells is good as gone as well. We probably would not miss Thames or Liddi, BUT... it does not make the choice to make the trade correct.
Facing facts:
We can not trade Ibanez, Bay, Peguero period.
We would be trading low on Smoak, Wells, Carp, Montero, Saunders, Guti, F. Martinez, Morban, Catricala.
I would NOT trade Morales or Saunders or Montero period, but thats me.
There has to be another answer that is fits better than Upton.

8

I'm not concerned about the talent of any of the Big Three. I suppose what you define as success would be the limiter.
Gio Gonzalez, who has a minor league line and talent level basically identical to Paxton's, "failed" his first two years. He walked everyone in those partial-season appearances. He still walks a bunch of people, though it's come down to "mostly acceptable" levels of walking. He gets away with it because he's so hard to hit - again, like Paxton, and so he's been a 3.5-4.5 WAR pitcher the last 3 years.
You willing to wait for James to settle down? "See what a failure this plan of going with the kids is?? In 2013 Paxton walked 5 guys per 9, and had a pathetic ERA+. Trade everyone!"
Hultzen is basically Cliff Lee. Everybody remember that Lee walked FOUR PER NINE in the minors, right? I know he's at 2 per 9 in the bigs now (and currently well below even THAT), but it took him several average-ish seasons with an ERA over 4 to get control of his arsenal and dissect opposing batters. "Danny's an average pitcher. Where's his greatness? His ERA+ is 105 - Vargas could have done that! We should have traded him."
Walker...man, nobody knows what Walker is, other than ridiculously exciting. He might be the best pitching prospect in the game, and considering who some of those prospects are, that's saying something. He's so very raw. He doesn't know baseball history, didn't watch a lot of baseball, hasn't played a lot... He's the Natural. When scouts compare a pitcher to the raw, unvarnished awesome that was young Doc Gooden, they're showing they certainly believe in his ceiling. But will there be bumps in the road?
Look, Pineda got injured. Campos too. We've lost untold pitchers to injury over the years. Talent can't always protect you from that. But assuming normal injury risks (all three guys have good mechanics, healthy usage, etc) then the only thing to fear is impatience.
If we decide we can't wait on all 3, and have to trade some of them to speed up our rebuilding process, then that's a risk. We have E-Ram, Beavan, Maurer, Sanchez, Pike, Capps, Wilhelmsen, et al hanging around if we do decide that. Our system is not exactly barren without them - Maurer is as good as the top pitcher in some systems, and Sanchez might be better than him.
There are only 5 starting slots. That doesn't mean we SHOULD trade one or more of the Big Three, but it's a consideration. We can be patient with them and let them pull us to 100-win seasons like Oakland's Big Three (or Atlanta's, or whomever's), we can get impatient and just keep the one we like best and use the rest to help the offense, or we can roll snake-eyes and lose them to Chance.
We have the ability to choose. Hopefullly we can avoid the whammy whether we press our luck or trade. But for these three specific guys, no I don't believe we're looking at the standard 30% chance of being a ML regular that you get with most blue chippers. They really are this special.
If one of em is running a 5 ERA next year, don't forget that. Patience. It will be rewarded.
~G

9

Spent the morning chasing steelhead with the fly rod........excellent rosterbation therapy.
Here's what I pondered up:
Upton's downside is Casper Wells. I like Wells. I want him to get plenty of PA's.
Upton's upside is, well, Upton in 'zona. That's quite sweet.
Ergo: I'll bite AND now consider (* see below)....a trade of one the Big Three. Hultzen, I think. But if I'm giving up a Big Three guy...I'm being very leary about including Franklin. Proceed with caution.....
* I'll bite with a Saunders CF and Upton RF and Raul/Wells or Guti platoon...would prefer Wells. However, acquire Upton and then the Raul signing becomes ultra-needless doesn't it.
I'm a bit warmer about Upton this PM.
moe

10
Josh Gibbs's picture

Personally, I do not want to trade for Upton. If he we was on our team, that would be great. But what the M's would have to give up in order to acquire him would be too much for us to afford. The D-backs would want one of the big three plus 2 or 3 add-ins. We would also have to pay Justin off because of the M's being on his no-trade clause. I say the M's stay away from Upton. Giancarlo Stanton, however, is a different story.

11
GLS's picture

...to get something, but I don't know. I like Upton. I didn't used to like him, but I've read enough positivity about the guy to convince me.
But you know, I kind of like the idea of playing it cool for at least another year and seeing what we have. I've been following Mariner prospects since the late-90's. In the beginning, I really didn't know anything and I would get excited about pretty much any prospect that showed decent numbers. I didn't have a frame of reference. But I do have a frame of reference now and from that perspective, what we have looks different. It looks legitimate. And because of that, I get this sinking feeling in my stomach when I hear people talk about how Jack needs to trade away our prospects because, of course, that's what you do, because everyone knows that prospects are just prospects and you can't build a true contender from your farm system. Or, he needs to trade these guys away because all the fans have left, and so we need to speed up the timetable or something. I don't like it. It stinks of Bavasi.
But, Upton is good too.

12

Just curious... not one.
The Mets need offense. Same with the Braves. The Phillies.
Yet not one is even being even in passing as a possibility of even talking to the D Backs..... odd.

13

But, looking at his career generally, you do get an impression that his down 2012 could have been affected by 'feeling unloved' in Arizona.  If so, I could see the young Griffey responding similarly.  I wonder if there are any parallels.

14

Your remark TR 'Trading for Upton means at least 3 of the above gets CUT for no return.'  At this point you're talking about SHEDDING lots of quality for zero ... Carp, Smoak, now Casper Wells... talent that you coughed up TOR starting to get.
This is one of the main reasons you play Stars & Scrubs.  With 25 (35) Honda Civics you wind up hemorrhaging WAR at the bottom of the roster.  Much better to be on the Tigers' end of a Fister-for-4-guys deal.

15

The DBacks made noises like they will adjust their expectations now.  And you're probably right - my throwaway comment about Paxton and Nick Franklin might have been off track.  Upton's market value seems to be plummeting as baseball watches them put Upton into a landlocked situation.
The jig seems to be up for them.

16

It's kind of like the Seahawks.  6-8 games into the year people were panicking ... some of them, anyway... and two months on, all of a sudden every position on the field looks like the product of a master script.
Three or four of these young talents jell -- say, Montero, Ackley, Paxton, Hultzen along with the already-jelled Erasmo Ramirez, Seager, Jaso and the bullpen -- and by June 15 you could have a Tampa West with everybody saying "why did you want to give these kids away for Upton again?"

17

Ja, the silence is a little bit eerie.  The value's plummeting and for all we can tell from here, the DBacks are getting crickets.  Makes you want to ask about something scary lurking behind the scenes.
Just noodlin'.

18
ghost's picture

...but the D'Backs may prefer to trade him out of league if they're gonna trade him so as to avoid him kicking their keisters every year. :)
I think Towers had that reputation in San Diego, if memory serves...that he never made blockbuster trades in-league.

19

Doc,
I am very worried about J Upton... but again if we can get him for 1 of the top 10, and a couple outside of it.... Hultzen Hicks, Carson Smith, & Carp.... DO it!

20
Taro's picture

Upton likely busts out this year.
Hand and thumb injury in '10 and '12, improving eye, age 26 season, massive talent.
Whether its in Seattle or not, we'll see I guess. I definetly wouldn't mind a trade-and-extension while his value is low.

Add comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.