Cardinals Perform Beautifully, Take 2-1 Lead
Game of inches

.

Dailing down, for a moment, the focus on Zen and on objective purity ... here are a few things that I personally found beautiful about game 3 of this year's Fall Classic:

.

The Boston Red Sox.  In the year 1901, the Boston Red Sox (ahem, "Americans" until 1908 - in the NFL my family refers to the local team as the "Boston Americans", because of the helmet logo) were led in victories by Cy Young.  He won 33 games, lost 10, and had a 1.62 ERA.  His Wins Above Replacement clocked in at 12.6, and he was in his prime.  Three years later, Young threw baseball's first perfect game, Perfect Game #1.

There is something timeless and beautiful about a team name that refers to baseball stirrups.  It is simple, it is unpretentious, and it is Americana.  

The city of Boston is not a recent development, not by American standards.  The baseball team has been part of the community for a while now. In 1901, the Huntington Grounds were 635 feet to center field, had patches of sand where grass wouldn't grow, and there was a tool shed in play.  

Baseball's roots are American, its tree trunk is American, and its branches and leaves are American.  It is a peaceful, prosperous, wholehearted and optimistic way to pass one's time.

The Red Sox' uniforms, in the year 2013, would not seem unusual to a man born during the Civil War.

.

The St. Louis Cardinals.  The St. Louis team became "The Cardinals" in 1900.  Guess who led them in WAR?  Cy Young, who "jumped" from the Cardinals to Boston before the 1901 season.  (Interestingly, the 1882 "Cardinals" were named the Brown Stockings.)

The "birds on a bat" design dates back to 1922, and ninety years later it is one of the most universally-recognized logos in the world.  Here is an interview with a modern Cardinals design consultant.

When I was in Little League, I was transfixed by the simplicity and variety of the team logos.  I hoped that I would get to play with the Pirates.  But the Cardinals also seemed very cool.  So did the Cubs.  There is something odd about the fact that innocuous animals like Orioles do not seem harmless in baseball.  That one, you'll have to explain to me.  No NFL team would call itself the Orioles, would they?  Maybe they would.  ::shrug::

...

What was happening in 1901?  Open your newspaper and you'd have read that ... Teddy Roosevelt decided to call it the "White House."  The first trans-atlantic radio signal was sent.  X-rays were discovered.  

Australia seceded from Britain.  In Texas they discovered that there was oil.  JP Morgan started US Steel.  

The pop music was Ragtime March.  Movies?  There was a bit of footage of McKinley taking his presidential oath.

And the St. Louis and Boston Ball Clubs were playing a game that, to a casual fan, would look just like the game looks now.  Very few things, in America, look like they did in 1901.  You're left with the impression that baseball is a mighty Treant, looking on calmly as eons ebb and eons flow.

.

The Fans.  Gordon could write us a moving essay about the fans.  Of either city!  St. Louis probably does have the best fans in baseball.  On the other hand, Fenway Park is a bucket list item.  If you were on your death bed, would you regret that you had never seen a game in Fenway?

My son John was surprised to learn that the World Series is not played on a neutral field, as is the Super Bowl.  What, the local fans get to see the games played in front of them?

.

The Matchup.  John Dewan points out, in this outstanding article, that (this year!) we get to see the best team from the American League play the best team from the National League.

Both teams won 97 games; Boston had the best run differential in baseball, at +197, and St. Louis had the next-best, at +187.  There is beauty in the fact that the champions happened to be the best teams.

What you might not have understood about the Cardinals, before John's article, was that they had the very best pitching in all of baseball.  Their defense was lousy, allowing -39 runs more than would an average/mediocre MLB defense.

(The Tigers got to the ALCS similarly -- their pitching was exceptional, but their defense allowed -63 runs more than average defense would.  The Tigers and Cardinals punted defense.)

If there is one aspect of baseball that Dr. D considers (lately) overblown, it's glovework.  The Cardinals and Tigers happen to agree.  But ... The issue of defense played heavily into Games 1-3.  You could say that poor defense gave away all three games.  Or not.

.

The Rules.  You know what the strike zone is there for?  The 1872 pitchers were supposed to give the batter a fair chance to hit the ball ... but without making it too easy.  A hundred and fifty years later, it is still 60 feet, 6 inches, the bases are still the same distance*, and we still have bang-bang plays at first.

Watching Koji Uehara hit the corners of the strike zone tonight, it hit me that you could time-warp a Red Sox fan into the seats from a hundred years ago.  How much coaching would he need to understand the dynamics of the matchup?  Absolutely zero.  Would that be true in the NBA?  Or in the NFL?

.

The Mistakes.  At least two games, maybe all three, were decided by imperfections in the play.

Some people react angrily to human frailty.  For me, it was poignant to watch a baseball pitcher throw the ball down the 3B line, losing a game.  Have you never thrown a ball down the 3B line?

These aren't automatons.  I'm glad they are not.  The very best baseball player in the world has the same hopes, fears, and frailties that you do.  It's a difference in degree.

Some things are best done by machines, including, sadly, chess.  Baseball is human, and humans are beautiful.  Not in the cliche'd sense, but in the dictionary sense.  A great athlete's triumphs, and setbacks, and courage, and poise, all fall into that category for us.

David Ortiz strikes out, and Jarrod Saltalamacchia throws balls down the foul line.  They'll be back tomorrow, grimly trying to do better.  When they do, we might get choked up.  In any case:  we fans, having watched that, will try to resolve our own life problems with greater determination.

.

The Tradition and the Novelty.  It's the same game it was 100 years ago.  And tonight, everybody was saying they had never seen a game end that way before.

Which is something you hear about once a week in baseball.  That you just saw something -- something important -- that you had never seen happen before.

How can that be?

Hm.  ... anyway:  baseball is an ancient scaffolding ... on which fresh portraits are routinely painted.  The contrast is poignant.

.

The Umpires.  It was a memorable shot, Saltalamacchia tagging out the second runner to come into home plate in the 9th, and the home plate umpire immediately and decisively pointing down to third base, signalling that the runner was safe.

Even in the face of such crushing pressure, the umpires remain relaxed and retain "soft vision," coolly taking in --- > not only the critical play occurring within 10 feet, but everything that is happening around the park.

I don't know how they do it.  Here's a postgame interview.

The players, the umpires, the managers, the ballboys and everybody else [allowed onto the grass] maintain a surgical frame of mind as they go about their business.  I don't know how Dr. Grumpy maintains his state of mind, in a surgical crisis, and I don't know how MLB(TM) actors do so either.

It is beautiful, though, you've got to give them that.

.

The Mariners.  You tell me.  How much beauty, how much soulfulness, have the Nintendo reps delivered us?

Be happy you have a baseball team at all, Howard told us this month.  If it weren't for us ... (sic; if it weren't for Hiroshi Yamauchi!, who could have appointed anybody his representative) ... the Mariners would be in Tampa.  So you can just shut your yaps about all the rest of it, everything that happens after we don't move to Tampa.  In perpetuity.  

If a hundred years from now, we still don't care about the pennant the way the Cardinals do, remember 1995.  We delivered our ultimatum, you were able to meet it, and you may forever after give thanks.

Well, Howard, we are a major league city, that's true, thanks to the stadium we built.  Whether we are a part of Americana, a part of the fabric of American baseball, that is another subject.

There is a whale of a difference between what the Seattle organization gives us, and what the Cardinals give to St. Louis.  What the Cardinals give their city, that is American beauty.  A full-throated battle for a pennant, that is what they gave your great-grandfather, and that is what they're giving you now.  They'll be giving it to your great-grandchildren.

But, hey, there are a lot of things to do in a baseball park besides just watch a game.

........

The good news is:  the individual Mariners on the roster, many of them do care about the pennant.  Watching Felix in the 7th inning of a game, when he is behind 0 to 1, there's nothing anybody can do to suppress that manifestation of beauty.

Beauty isn't all there is to sports.  I'm not going to be worried much about it during Monday night's Seahawk game.  But it does have its place, and the more so in the particular sport of baseball.

Enjoy,

Jeff

.

Blog: 

Comments

1
misterjonez's picture

As you've said for as long as I've read you, pro sports are simulated warfare. There are so many things involved with the pageantry, the analysis, and the behind-the-scenes maneuvering that we sometimes forget that.
Secretariat, as you outlined in the other article, is beloved precisely for his absolute throttling of the field AFTER victory had been well-achieved. Mike Tyson is fondly remembered for hammering away on guys so hard to the body that they literally just wanted to quit after two or three rounds, at which point they submitted and he knocked their heads off. Babe Ruth will forever be remembered for his well-deserved arrogance at being able to do anything his competitors could do, only better -- quite literally. Bill Gates' legacy is in his (il)legal maneuvers through his competition to get a stranglehold on what may end up being the most important marketplace ever created.
The list goes on and on, but the simple truth is that if one consistently wages battle in pursuit of victory, then they will attract followers and fans alike. Have a little success along the way, and they'll be remembered (just ask the M's brass and they'll buff their nails on 1995). Win eleven (twelve?) championships along the way and you'll be loved -- so long as you continue to Fight the Good Fight.

2

It looks like St Louis punted on SBs too. Pretty stark difference between the Sox and Cards yet both had great seasons. As much as I love the SB (and also defense) for its entertainment value it looks like overall impact of SB may be a lot less than it would seem.

3

The Cardinals seem to have this never-ending queue of 25-26 year old rookie position players breaking into the team. We M's fans howl for every prospect of note to hit the big league club as soon as they hit well for a month at AA. St Louis bakes their hitters in the minors for a good long time and only graduates them when they are finished. With pitchers, it seems to be the opposite. They draft 'em, clean up their delivery and get them onto the club as soon as they can hit the strike zone with regularity.
They have somehow hit a sweet spot of great drafting, player development and free agent signings; a great mix of veterans and youth. They draft and develop players like no other team. Think about it - they are a top tier, winning club that never gets a top ten draft pick, yet most of their team is home-grown. I'm not sure if an organization can be beautiful or not but if so, the Cardinals are it.

4
bsr's picture

Cardinals are the San Antonio Spurs of MLB...they just have it all figured out these days (and pretty much, always have). I sometimes think about, whenever the M's are making a move, what would the Cardinals think? You have to figure that orgs like the Cards (if they could be bothered to pay any attention to the M's), would be laughing their butts off or scratching their heads mystified at what we are doing. Like, why did you sign / draft / call up / release / etc THAT guy? I know there is a lot of luck involved in sports but surely we make a number of decisions that better orgs would just know 100% are the wrong move.
Anyway, it's inspiring to see a well run org, you can always dream about the M's getting a clue someday. It does seem the Seahawks are moving down that path, very rewarding and exciting to be a part of.

5

While I understand to some degree why "moments" are more important than long-term achievements, at least on the emotional level ... I think it sad that the 116 win season for the Mariners is not appreciated as (IMHO) I believe it should be.
Every year somebody wins a title. (except in strike years).
That's 100 WS winners in 100 years.
116 wins in a season.
That happens once per 100 years.
Since 1991, I've gotten to watch the Braves in the post-season 17 times. From 1970 (when I first became a Braves' fan) to 1990, I got to watch one.
Granted, I did get to see them win 1 WS Title. But, I understand today that 14 straight post seasons - (in which there WAS a post-season) is not only FAR more impressive than the Marlins' two titles --- it is also a vastly superior MODEL for a team to root for.
With Atlanta two states away, I am not geographically bound to being a Braves fan. But, I made that choice at age 10 and am not liable to change. But, if I were to pick another franchise - it would likely be St. Louis. What is most impressive about the Cardinals to me - is that they have NEVER been accused of not caring about winning - yet, they have also never been a team to bloat their payroll. They spent $112.5 million this year - (a franchise high), but for the most part stay firmly in the middle of the pack among NL spenders -- perpetually behind the "rich" clubs, (Mets, Dodgers, Cubs), but only occasionally the leader among the "rest of the league".
They develop talent regularly - Ozzie, Pujols, Carpenter
But, they are also willing to bring in FAs - Rolen, McGwire, Holiday
Yet, they never feel compelled to splurge just to "prove" they are serious about winning.
Many assumed when they let Pujols go that they would suffer a down cycle for at least awhile.
While you are a Cardinal, you are treated as family. And when the business of the game says they can no longer afford you - they thank you for your service and wish you well. In many ways, the Braves have tried to build a similar franchise. They haven't quite pulled it off - but they're close. So, it's a nice franchise to be able to support. Then again, they are pretty competent at it today - (and they certainly weren't back in the 70s and 80s.

6

Much I can agree with, in fact most. I would LOVE to transfer my allegiance to the Cardinals franchise, but I can't. At least so far. Instead, I must suffer with a franchise that combines futility with the lack of institutional competence and the lack of a "can do/will do" spirit of determination.
But regarding the 116-win season, I cannot feel as good as you. The object of the baseball season is not to do something most rare; it ought to be to win the World Series. I would compare it to a war. If you do something rare, even astonishing and win a battle, but in the end you lose the war, you do not celebrate as if the battle you win overshadows the loss of the war. You say to yourself, "What good was it to win that battle when we lost the war?!" By losing the war, the battle became pointless.
Granted the metaphor breaks down in that a team that makes the playoffs but exits before the World Series is not occupied by a foreign army, it does not lose it freedom of action. It lives to celebrate as best it can what it has achieved. But rarity is not the measure of those achievements. My twopence.

7

I get where you're coming from DaddyO.
I understand that title are the ultimate goal at the team level. Champions ARE what we laud - in all sports.
But, consider this.
Hank Aaron won a single WS - in '57 - in Milwaukee, and only reached the post season a total of 3 times, (losing the WS in '58 - and in the NLCS to the Miracle Mets in '69).
Yet, think of how revered the all time INDIVIDUAL stats are in baseball.
In fact, just reaching certain milestone - shared by a small group of people - like 300 wins or 500 HRs -- cements many a player FOREVER in the annals of history.
Today, NOBODY remembers that Aaron was actually NL MVP in 1957 when he hit 44 HRs and had 132 RBI. But, even today, many people consider Aaron the all time HR hitter (the Bonds' numbers being "tainted").
In other sports - where stars ALWAYS get the ball at critical times - greatness is generally measured in titles - not yards or points. But, in baseball, gaining Hall of Fame status is almost exclusively about production over time - and "totaling" more (of whatever) than previous generations.
Yet ... at the team level ... in the sport which has the lowest margin of victory - where everyone KNOWS the luck factor is the greatest of any sport -- the sport where they just tweaked the wild card rule to try and give the teams with the best record some kind of assistance - (and this year it paid off with the two best records meeting in the title match). In THIS sport - where we know the luck factor is through the roof - the "magical" win total for a season is almost completely ignored.
Yeah, the 116 win season isn't going to be appreciated like a WS title. But, I'm arguing that it should be FAR more appreciated than it is.
Of course, if Seattle HAD managed to net a title - they probably would have been mentioned as one of the greatest teams of all time.
But, because NY won a particular 4 out of 5 ... the fact Seattle won 21 more games than NY during the regular doesn't matter?
That's the way it is. But, that 2001 season ... the Yankees had the 3rd best record in the AL and went to the WS. Arizona had the 3rd best record in the NL ... and went to the WS. The Yankees finished 21 games behind Seattle - Arizona finished 24 back. That's kind of like what Secretariat did in the Belmont.
In 17 seasons since MLB made a WC, 5 wild cards have won the WS.
In 42 Superbowls where WCs existed, 6 wild cards have won.
Is Arizona over NY really the best two teams duking it out -- or it is the title of World's best 3rd place team?
Before 1969, each league had a single winner - and nobody else got to participate in the post-season. So, prior to '69, it was the best team from each league. And in most sports, the "normal" final tends to be the two best teams. Wild Card participants in the SB are rare - and making it to the title series in the NBA is nearly impossible for the teams seeded outside the top 2.

8

I definitely value the 116 game season over a WS win. WS is somewhat arbitrary... The116 win season resulted from domination in all phases of the game. A thing of beauty.

Add comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.