Sizzlers & Fizzlers - the Trend

=== Sizzlers:  Eric Wedge ===

For those who missed the memo - which is plenty of amigos - Eric Wedge walks into the 2011 clubhouse wearing fangs down to his chin.

As Geoffy pointed out before spring camp ever started, if Wedge and an unnnamed ballplayer -- let's just call him Shawn Foulups to avoid any similarities to persons real or fictional - come to blows, then Jack Zduriencik's cut man is in Wedge's corner.   Either Eric goes or I go?  This year, it's you, Shawn.


.........

Ericcc's ability to dismantle a bullpen engine and forget how it goes back together --- > is well documented.  Meaning, of course, documented by me.  

If we haven't measured this dude's ability to compound-fracture a bullpen, then it can't be measured.  (Which is likely, but you know.)

It's not like SSI is blind to possible problemos in the managerial corner.

..........

But!  That big asterisk conceded -- SSI loves what it sees so far.  If it looks like a good manager, walks like a good manager and quacks like a good manager, it probably is a good manager.  And SSI has seen them all, literally them all, going back to Darrell Johnson locally and back, non-locally, to the guys like Harry Walker, Ralph Houk and Walter Alston.

Wedge is a guy who can get his guys in the fight, and keep them there, for a year or two anyway.  

He looks like a real good fit for what Jack Zduriencik is trying to do.  ... other fans look at Ericcc as wimping out to Capt Jack.  SSI looks at it like this:  if the offensive line and wideouts aren't doing as the QB expects, you got a problem.

.

=== Fizzlers:  Team Vibe ===

In 2009, the Mariners won 85 games and then they added --- > Cliff Lee to that club.  (It only seems like it was 1909.)

Most people had the M's as ready to contend.  About the only two people who waged war on that idea, who I can remember, were Bill James and Geoff Baker.  (Well, James wasn't waging war; he wasn't interested enough to swat Zduriencik with a rolled-up 1979 Sporting News, but Baker waged war.)

The same Geoffy is now advising us, from the same March 20th in-clubhouse view, that this team is ready to implode again.

...............

This doesn't hit me as gospel, but it does hit me as alarming.

Once you get past the brainiest reactions to Baker's on-site assessment, such as "Baker is not me!  How could he know anything?" ... you're left wondering why the first three weeks left him with that impression.

.

=== Dr's Diagnosis ===

It is hard enough to predict what Milton Bradley will do.  

There isn't any way to predict, reliably, what a volatile 25-man roster will do.  There are too many moving parts.  

Trying to predict which MLB team will go from 97 wins to a losing record -- as the Angels did last year -- is like trying to predict at which exit will occur the next car crash on I-5.

After the 2000 seasons, most people had the Mariners strongly down...

............

I don't know whether the M's will win 90 or lose 100.  I don't think anybody else does, either.

It's March.  That's one of my favorite times in the baseball season.  I choose to hope, not because it will earn me scowls from the sportswriters, though that's a fringe benefit.

I don't have to bet money on the season, and don't have to predict an UP or DWN year.  I can simply root for Bedard, Pineda, Smoak, Lueke, and Cust to come through.

At least until April 10, that's what I'll do.  Sleeves up, leanin' back in the bleachers, big smile on, I'm watching to see if our new Big Three and MOTO are going to kick some tail.  They might.

.

Enjoy,

Jeff

.

Comments

1

There is definately some implode opportunity with this team.  It would be easy to bet the Over on that one.
Felix will be not quite as great.  MB could pull a MB.  Figgins might pout like a champion again. Bedard breaks.  The bullpen may pour gasoline on every fire.  Etc. Et Cetera. &.....
 
Becasue Saunders is lost, I have a feeling that Langerhans is about to be our 4th outfielder. That's a move that I hate, BTW.  Not because he's not a decent ML'er, he is.  But that's the point.  His upside is as a decent ML'er...that's it.  Basically  he's a guy just above the replacement level. He's going to hit .230 with 4 or 5 homers...if he gets 200 PA's.
He's 31 years old...he's helping the M's go exactly nowhere. For a team going nowhere, keeping a guy going nowhere makes no sense..if you have guys to look at.
Mike Wilson...Pleeeeeeeeeze.  Give him a shot.  He may have no great MLB future...but he might just show some TTO-lite type of skills. He may just show up as a guy to keep around for a few years. 
I can live with Kennedy, because he can play 5 different positions, but when Langerhans makes the opening day lineup.....we've imploded a bit, or perhaps it's just my optimism that's imploding.
 
Keith 
 

2
ghost's picture

I have no problem with having Langerhans around as a 4th outfielder in the short term...mostly because I think our fourth outfielder will eventually be...Adam Kennedy (when he gets bumped from the line-up by Dustin Ackley)...our offensive problems are far more front and center than who our fourth outfielder is. We need a lot of guys to return to career norms from two or three years ago to be successful this year. Cust, Figgins, Bradley, Guti, Wilson/Kennedy...and we need at least one or two youngsters to have nice UP seasons (Smoak, Ackley, Moore...)
Too much has to go right for me to believe we're going anywhere near contention.

3

No argument from me ghost.  I was simply commenting on the fact that implosion may well occur. I'm trying to be optimistic that it will not, despite the factors I mentioned...But non-implosion is not the same as contention.
And the Langerhans issue is simply a part of a large picture.  When you're the Yankees and your contending every year then you and live with a 31 yr. old OF guy on the bench with some glove and an 86 OPS+ career number.  If you're a team in rebuilding mode and trying to find out who your players are then it doesn't make very much sense.
 

4
ghost's picture

...you believe that none of your marginal prospects is actually capable of being even a RLP.  Mike Wilson certainly isn't (hello whiff-o-matic!), Matt Tui isn't...(at least not IMHO)...Saunder sisn't right now (too messed up)...Gross is no better than Langerhans...the problem isn't carrying Langerhans...the problem is having NO ONE in the youth core that is worth playing.  That's mostly Bavasi's fault...Z is still trying to fix it.

Add comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.