Sweeeeeep
Game of Inches, dept.

.

Dave Neihaus said something, about 1979 or so, back when Dr. D wore a younger man's clothes.  It stuck with him ever since.  The M's somehow won the first three games of a series, way into the dog days of summer, and then botched Game 4.  "You figured the M's were in for it today," Dave said.  "You just don't see too many four-game sweeps in baseball.  Too many things can happen."

It's blinkin' rare to go 4-0 in May, even if you've got the best team in baseball against the worst.  It is even rarer for two teams to match each other perfectly, base-for-base, and then to align those four games such that one team wins all of them....

THREE TRUE OUTCOMES, May 17-20, 2013

  Seattle Cleveland
Strikeouts 38 39
Walks 13 15
Home Runs 8 7

The hits were square, 35-40, and the total bases were even more so, 66-71.  Add walks in there ... like we sez, when you got 79 bases for one side and 86 for the other, the odds against a four-game sweep in baseball have got to be 100-1.

.

Sgt Wedge Dept. 

In games this tight, the little things decide.  That's why we've got zealous fans chipping their teeth about decisions Eric Wedge made:  because those decisions decide games like this.  You could very easily imagine a different set of managerial decisions, and a 3-1 series win for the M's.  That's the reality.

By the way, gentlemen, Gordon is co-author of the blog now, fortunately for Dr. D :- ) and we do appreciate your giving him some reasonable measure of deference when it comes to blog tone-and-flavor.  That's his responsibility.  Part of the reason you're here is blog tone-and-flavor ... which is on us.

I also wouldn't want the blog to turn into a monotonous, boring, trite, Monday-morning quarterbacking of Wedge's calls.  Of course neither do none of you, especially Super-Poster PHXTerry.  That said, anybody who wants to call attention to this or that specific decision, if it's an interesting 'put, knock yourself out.

.

Bet You Can't Do That Again, Dept. 

If the little things matter, how about the blown strike call in the 2nd inning on Monday?

In case you didn't see it on TV ... Iwakuma had 2 on, 2 out, and an 0-2 count on Ryan Rayburn.  Kuma froze Rayburn with an 87 slider , thigh high, middle-away.  Nowhere near any edge of the zone.  Kuma walked back to the dugout.  That's pitch 3 on the lead image up there.  

The image doesn't convey the fact that Iwakuma hit Shoppach's mitt.  Shoppach was holding his mitt well into the strike zone for the umpire to stare at, and Iwakuma threw the ball into it, and the umpire said, Um, No.  It was quite intentional on the umpire's part.

The ump called Kuma back to face the Indians' rally again. The Indians went on to score four runs.  Kuma locked them down easily in innings 4-6.  The ump calls that strike, the entire postgame is different.

My postgame ranting about the strike zone, now THAT is becoming monotonous, boring, and trite.  It is also a factor that has cost the M's at least 5 games that I remember.

..........

Why do folks assume that strike zones are about the catcher's physical movements?  They don't assume that CERA is due to catcher intervention.  How do we know it's not bias against the pitcher, or the team?

"If you were wrong, how would you know, Doc."  How I would know, is that the Mariners would bring in a Kelly Shoppach type, and he'd get calls, while Montero wouldn't.  Actually, though, what happens is that every catcher who becomes a Mariner becomes bad at pitch framing.

...........

In fairness, the M's didn't quantitatively get that many pitches taken from them Monday.  Iwakuma lost 5 pitches and gained 2; Kazmir lost 4 pitches and gained one.  You can't measure the bias that way, although you can quantify that 0-2 pitch; it was worth four runs.

You can quantify the bias this way.  Chances that the umpire misses that same pitch on CC Sabathia, 0-2 pitch, rally situation, Sabathia hits the catcher's mitt in the middle of the plate ... Chance = exactly zero.  0.00%.

.

Quintessential Glass Half-Full SSI Finish

1.  The Indians are red-hot smokin' on a roll, and the Mariners played them to a dead draw, and except for the bounce of the ball the series woulda gone 2-2.  This despite the fact that the Indians were at home, and are objectively speaking a bad matchup for the Mariners.

Mariners keep playing exactly this tough, they're going to play .600 ball for a good stretch, after things even out and they hit some easy teams.

..........

2.  The way that the lefty Indians took it to Felix and Iwakuma the last two days.  Maurer's game look pretty good to you now?  This series, he actually did outpitch Felix and Iwakuma -- and this in the hotly-debated RHP vs LHB context.

Only one more game and we're back to Brandon Maurer :- )

.

 

 

Blog: 

Comments

1

The explanation for the Ms horrible luck over the last few seasons is obvious. The curse resulting from the trade of Fister. Lets hope it doesn't last as long as the Red Sox or Cubs curses.

3

This game was a Mariners win if Tom Wilhelmsen catches the ball at first in the 9th. And it's at least not over in the 10th when Yan Gomes comes to the plate if Justin Smoak catches the ball at 1st because Furbush would almost certainly have walked him to set up the double play. They lost the first and second games of the series in large part because of infield singles. It's a series of bad breaks that gave the Indians the sweep.

4

In 2013 th M's have been handed an unexpected and marvelous opportunity - the AL West is weaker than expected with the Angels struggling and the A's coming down from last year's peak, combined with the chance to beat up 19 times on the Lastros. So far the M's have squandered that opportunity, and now must make a sustained run of winning baseball to get back into the WC race. Unfortunately, the M's have enough built-in disadvantages that I believe it is unlikely that they can sustain a winning run of games:
1) 2B is an offensive black hole that is not being addressed
2) SS is an offensive black hole that is not being addressed
3) When Montero catches, that position is also an offensive drag and defensively, his inability to control the running game put the M's at a disadvantage
4) The back of the pitching rotation is inconsistent
5) Umpires on-going strike-zone bias costs the M's runs regularly; yesterday and the 1st game in NY last week primary exhibits
A cumulative effect of these disadvantages is that the M's are not winning close games: they are 1-4 in extra inning games and 6-8 in 1-run games. (Texas is 9-3 in one run games while the A's are 8-6.) It appears to me that the combined weight of these obstacles most likely will prevent the M's from winning enough of their future close games to sustain the run needed to get back in the WC. And, unfortunately, I see no evidence of any action by the M's Brain Trust to solve any of these issues in a timely enough fashion to get back in the WC race.

5
tjm's picture

This isn't exactly pertinent to yesterday and don't know if it's behind paywall, but an interesting ump's point of view on the framing debate. In a BP Q&A, retired longtime ump Jim McKean is very defensive about the idea of framing - doesn't want anyone to think the umps are gullible - but says that catchers who catch the ball properly get more calls. Not because they like those catchers, but because they make the ump's job easier.
In other words, they like guys who are physically quiet. Montero notably is not so is gonna have problems long term unless and until he calms down.
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=20623
That said, the Iwakuma call was as bad as it gets. Sims and Blowers were just about speechless. Diaz didn't get any better as the day went on , either. `Kuma impressively humped up and ignored it.
In terms of the game management, I was surprised not to see Farquhar, And is Ackley now in a straight platoon?

6
M-Pops's picture

Good stuff, Doc et all.
I wouldn't mind the terrible calls so much if Wedge would start holding the umps accountable. The game he was thrown out of Wedge managed from the clubhouse with the help of a M's page boy, so that shouldn't be an issue.
Would like to see Wedge fight for those close calls as hard as the players seem to battling their opponents.

7

I'm sure McKean is being sincere in his opinion, but it becomes a matter of "Who ya gonna believe, me or your own eyes?" We've ALL seen pitch framing work. My guess, the umpires simply cannot catch (and thus discount) the snatched strike. McKean thinks he can, no doubt, and probably often does. And I can't speak for McKean specifically, but his compatriots fall for it regularly. I guess the real question is, just HOW regularly? And is it MORE REGULARLY for some teams, if you catch my drift.

8

It's EASY for me to say, but if I'm being unfairly targeted I do everything possible to advertise and highlight the problem. If those imposing the problem refuse to change, then by golly at least their going to have to put up with doing it with the full knowledge of the public. Otherwise you're just lying down and accepting things the way they are. It won't change.

9
Montucky's picture

looks the same as 'Kuma's. Felix perfectly sticks strike three, called a ball. Next pitch, homer. I couldn't stop screaming at the TV. I completely agree with a tone in the ear...get the game RIGHT!! Sooner Selig leaves the better. Compared to the NFL and tennis(!), MLB is kind of embarassing with their heels dug in the past.

Add comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.