Newcastle 4, Gunners 4 - Tragedy Strikes

In Numbers 16, if I recall correctly, it speaks of the earth opening up, swallowing a contingent of hostile visitors, and the earth closing up again.  However, in that instance they had warning.

.

1-4 Newcastle:  the ref followed his red card by handing a Newcastle a free touchdown, er, a penalty kick goal.

.......................

2-4 Newcastle:  The Gunners, playing with one man less, unsure of whether to pad their lead, and in total confusion, conceded a rather soft goal ... though with only 15 minutes left in the game to hold their lead.

Arsenal has the 2nd-best midfield in the world, behind Barcelona, and normally if they have a lead they simply start knocking the ball around playing keep-away. 

Why they did not, in this instance, is even more of a mystery than how Diaby's leg was not broken.  Arsenal's passing genius Cesc Fabregas dropped back to his own penalty area playing as a second "holding midfielder" (the equivalent of strong safety in the NFL).

......................

3-4 Newcastle:  the ref, having put about 500 quid on Newcastle, gave them another penalty goal with 7 minutes left.  The crowd, as you can imagine, was now doing Seahawks fans proud.

......................

4-4 Newcastle:  Tiote took a ferocious shot from 25 yards out, left foot.  The ball, at about 55-60 mph, swerved madly away from the goalie and screamed just inside the left post.

My son John compared it to a Vlad Guerrero double down the line just past a diving Adrian Beltre.

.......................

So the Gunners go through another week of accusation for "lack of moral fiber," but they get the last laugh:  the only team in front of them, Manchester United, lost to the last team in the standings. 

Arsenal gains ground with the tragedy.

.

It'll be a long 8 days,

Dr D

Comments

1

your team made two critical errors: both revolve around playing too aggressively in the box with a big lead. There is no excuse for that. Even if a player was avenging a previous foul, you don't commit those in the box. The first foul (actually multiple fouls) was too obvious and the attacker had their back to the goal. The second foul was just plain dumb since the striker had no real angle, and thus, no chance to score.
I really don't know why I keep following the M's when my 3rd love is soccer.
Thanks for the articles Dr. D!

2

Arsenal were rubbish :- ) in the second half, no doubts there.
Not -4 goals' worth of rubbish, but true that they have themselves to blame, along with a ref willing to hand Newcastle two spot kicks and an extra man in one half.
Who's to blame for #1 losing at #20?

3
Anonymous's picture

Whilst Wolves are no 20 this season, you should note that they've already beaten Chelsea, Man City and Liverpool and most of their struggles have come against teams in the lower half of the table. 
Many pundits/fans I've spoken to think they're better than their position suggests (based on the quality of their play) and you could argue that Man Utd are flattering to deceive this season.  In fact, this is less than a vintage edition of Man Utd but they've benefited from equally erractic play from all of their contemporaries.
The Gunners have suffered greater reverses than Man Utd's performance against Wolves.  See:
Ipswich (a league below them and struggling in that league),
Spurs (2-0 lead at home thrown away against arch enemies),
Newcastle (at home)
West Brom (at home)
My gut feeling is that once again, Arsenal don't have the stomach for the fight and are too prone to defensive lapses.  Man Utd, on the other hand, regularly win games in the last 10 minutes, precisely because they never believe they're beaten.

4

Sorry, didn't mean to be anonymous - have problems saving my message which seems to have removed my name.

5

Though they continue to stare Championship play squarely in the face, they've proven that they can be dangerous. 
Seattle sports fans just spent an NFL season watching exactly the same thing:  the Seahawks were capable of dreadful performances but just as capable of coming out on a given day and beating a contender from first minute to last, home or road.
Excellent caveat on Wolverhampton.  Glad that they rose to the occasion vs Man U :- )

6

My gut feeling is that once again, Arsenal don't have the stomach for the fight and are too prone to defensive lapses

With that run of 1/30 points vs Man U and Chelsea, I figured that they'd be accused of this until --- > they gave a proper beating to one side or the other.
Now that they've crushed Chelsea like a soda can, the bar gets kicked down the field to --- > 'hardware'.
After they win the Carling, it will be kicked down the field again... ;- )
....................
Wenger likes his agile little Smurfs and the Premier League likes just as well to dive into tackles and send the Smurfs off to the hospitals in helicopters - Eduardo, Ramsey, etc and Diaby should have been the most recent addition to the EPL's collection of nasty scalps from Arsenal.
With the emergence of flick-knife fighter Nasri, with the emergence of Song, Wilshere, Chamakh etc, I'm hopeful that the Gunners have added the much needed grit...

Add comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.