Adam Dunn

Just stream-of-consciousness, not POTD. :- )

.

=== "Sample Size" of One Dept. ===

I don't know if we're going to spend the next three years using Richie Sexson as the scarecrow to keep all of those nasty FA buzzards away. But just off the top of our heads, here:

1. Adam Dunn is lefthanded. I've heard that matters in Safeco. Jack Zduriencik seems to think that is an important factor.

2. Richie Sexson was a fairly extreme groundball hitter. Adam Dunn is a fairly extreme flyball hitter. You're not talking about similar swings here. Dunn isn't a topspin guy.

3. IF Adam Dunn had exactly Richie Sexson's age-arc, he'd have three (3) great seasons followed by a dropoff. Dunn is a year younger than Sexson was, when signed.

4. It is open to question whether Sexson was demoralized, over the course of 2.5 years, by Safeco and by bad luck (remember Sexson's .210 BABIP's). The jury is out as to whether Sexson will bounce back, as Jeff Cirillo and other Safeco refugees did.

Dunn of course has many similarities to Sexson: for one thing, he's very tall. He has that in common with Frank Howard and Dave Winfield, also. But whereas Sexson was tall and lanky, Adam Dunn is about 270 lbs. You know you're not talking steroids on this dude.

After you sign Dunn you could go get Hagrid for 3B, though his cap would fly off worse than Felix’.

Dunn fans a good 165 times a year — but also walks 110. (Jay Buhner, in his prime, averaged 160 and 100.) Dunn up there stalking the pitcher, trying to get one pitch a game that he can get some really good radio interference on. In Earl's words, "once every 13 AB's he's doing a whale of a lot to win me a ball game."

Turn that “Hit It Here” neon arrow back on, Rick.

Dunn is an extreme Three True Outcomes player. The Seattle blog-o-sphere is subconsciously biased against these players: Jack Cust was a case in point. TTO's feel unreliable. They aren't, really. They control their own destinies.
baseball-reference.com, using match criteria that compare favorably to PECOTA’s, came up with this set of comps for Dunn at 25 years of age:

Darryl Strawberry (927)
Reggie Jackson (926) *
Jose Canseco (918)
Troy Glaus (909)
Tom Brunansky (902)
Juan Gonzalez (901)
Boog Powell (901)
Rocky Colavito (891)
Tony Conigliaro (890)
Harmon Killebrew (883) *

SLAP me SILLY, Padna.

Nowadays, after Dunn's age-28 year, these are the comps. Here they are, with their futures from age 29 on:

 Sim  Player              From  To Yrs   OPS+
+---++-------------------+---------+--+----+-----+----+----+---+---+---+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+----+---+----+
      Adam Dunn           Was not playing, is not playing, or has not yet played at this age.
 920  Darryl Strawberry   1991-1999  9  120
 906  Jose Canseco        1994-2001  8  125
 902* Harmon Killebrew    1965-1975 11  143
 895  Rocky Colavito      1963-1968  6  124
 889* Reggie Jackson      1975-1987 13  131
 867  Troy Glaus          2006-2008  3  122
 865  Tom Brunansky       1990-1994  5   97
 861  Barry Bonds         1994-2007 14  199
 859  Roger Maris         1964-1968  5  116
 859  Boog Powell         1971-1977  7  129

 859  AVERAGE             1971-1977  8  139

After you throw out Bonds and Brunansky, the other guys averaged 7 years x 135 OPS+ ... starting with Dunn's next season.

What can you confidently take from this set of stats-generated comps? We'll spend a separate post on Dr. D's own rationale on Dunn comps. For now, let's just say that b-ref.com's set of comps is at least as good as the set of comps that reads "Richie Sexson."

For now, let's also notice that Adam Dunn has done things that are similar to what Harmon Killebrew and Reggie Jackson did -- not things that are similar to what Chris Shelton has done.

.

=== SMILE When You Brush Me Back, Meat ===

You know, there is honestly something to say about bringing the biggest men to a sports contest. … We remember a Mariner quote from the time, regarding Canseco and McGwire and Parker, and Stewart. It was Chuck Armstrong or Alvin Davis or Jeff Smulyan or somebody who said, "When you play those guys, they are intimidating. They are large men, and they can back that size up with performance." Seriously.

I realize that to commentators who are not athletes, this will sound silly. But some of you have gone out to play in a slo-pitch league, or whatever, and in some game or other you looked over and the other guys looked like they should be on TV or whatever ... and right there, you started wondering whether you could win. It MATTERS. It doesn't matter as MUCH to guys playing 162 games, but there is still the "bully and customer" aspect on the human level.

I'm not arguing that you should go get Adam Dunn because he's Frankenstein. I'm just saying the guy's a load.

I'll go the season tickets to the Hit It Here Cafe. And bring a hard hat and safety goggles. The Mariners would be more fun than Mariner Central on July 31.

BABVA,

jemanji

.....................

images:  http://www.vintagecardtraders.org/virtual/67topps_posters/67topps_poster...

Comments

1

Agreed with that post. Still think B-Ref comps are illogical and silly. But if you composite enough of them, the picture does become pretty clear. I don't see Dunn is a risky pick at all. And I don't get this attitude of "well if we sign Dunn we cog the DH spot and our prospects won't have a place to play!"
Um...Dunn IS our prospects. When they're all grown up and good. I mean if Jeff Clement turns into Adam Dunn some day...we'd be thrilled. If we sign Dunn and Clement can't stick at C...you can try him at 1B or let Dunn stick a glove on that giant hand of his and pretend to be a fielder...who cares...it's first base!

2
Sandy - Raleigh's picture

I wouldn't object to signing Dunn in general. But, I would have to know the money and terms of the contract before putting forth my assessment of the short-term AND long-term ramifications of such a signing.
In general, I completely agree with Matt, that given the team mix, a player like Dunn would be a plus the team with potential side benefits nearly impossible to measure. I also agree with Matt that the Ichiro-ness of Seattle over the past 4 years has likely increased the fan-based distaste for TTO hitters, so they'll be extremely frustrated with him unless he gets out of the gate VERY quickly.
Mostly, though, I'm still convinced the club is better off long-term to let the crops bloom and THEN buy the imports, (I'm working on an article to go into this more fully, but it'll be next year before it hits the web).
I see an "inefficiency" in the basic concept of - plug DH -- THEN see if Clement works out at catcher, and if not, move him to 1B -- and if THAT doesn't work out - move Dunn to 1B and Clement to DH -- and if THAT doesn't work out .....
Me? I'd rather get the answer on Clement and Rob Johnson *FIRST*. Whatever that answer happens to be, it simplifies the entire "which FA to get" concept based on "knowing" which spots are (or are not) covered.

3

++Um…Dunn IS our prospects. When they’re all grown up and good++
LOL :- )
And that kinda sounded like a Padna quote. Guess he's getting us all trained.

4

++ I wouldn’t object to signing Dunn in general. But ...++
Sandy, can you hear yourself talk?
If I didn't know better, I'd start to suspect that you're becoming a Mariners fan...
...........
++ Mostly, though, I’m still convinced the club is better off long-term to let the crops bloom and THEN buy the imports ++
That certainly gives you the advantage of "agility" ... in chess, "piece mobility" ... with respect to year 3 or 4.
At cost. It slides the emphasis heavily away from years 1 and 2. Which is fine, if that's what you want to do.
Agility, scalability, integratability :- ) etc etc etc, all are important principles. As with a well-played game of chess, no one principle can be an absolute, but all must be taken into consideration.

5

I don't think clogging ONE position with a long term contract is going to change the agility equation much...even if it is DH.
One wonders is Zduriencik is keeping in mind that this is an AL club and we need 9 bats, not just 8. :)

Add comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.