You are here

Tuesday Afternoon Triple Shot

Replies

SABR Matt's picture

If Wilson got hurt again, Hannahan would not play a month of short...he would continue to be the UT man while they called up Johs WIlson or Chris Woodward or whoever to play a month of short...if you DL a shortstop, you do get to call up another one. :)

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

The only potential drawback being, that you haven't planned on a real replacement.

But yeah.  Josh Wilson would probably be fine if Jack's injury didn't require any prosthetics.

SABR Matt's picture

If Jack blows out an ACL, we're hosed at short...but that's going to be true either way, because we don't have a shortstop at any level in the system that's ready to outhit Josh Wilson at the moment.  Which means we'd have to somehow acquire one...which I'm quite sure Zduriencik is always trying to do, but teams hold their middle infielders like a running back holds the football...with both hands and the chest like it was their own baby. :)  So it's not a simple matter to get an extra shortstop.

IcebreakerVFX's picture
Submitted by IcebreakerVFX on

The problem with Wilson is that it's not just 30-day trips we should be worried about. It's the dumb nagging ones that take 10 days, but not quite DL worthy. Or the ones that pretend to be 10-day naggers that actually end up with him on the DL, like the heel.

 

BTW, the authentication is messed up. I can log in, but it doesn't keep it.

Taro's picture
Submitted by Taro on

Gomes is a little more attractive as a raw bat. Both Gomes and Garko mash lefties, but Gomes has more upside against RHPs (making him a better candidate to suprise if he takes over as a fulltime DH).

Garko, on the other hand, can play a competent 1B. Gomes is a pure DH.

I think I prefer Gomes in our situation, but either would work. What we really need is another lefty bat that can mash righties. For all the praise we've given Z for making this team Safeco-friendly, the lineup is still MUCH stronger vs LHP.

CA's picture
Submitted by CA on

So what's the deal, with Hanahan?  Doc, you know the answer, he has passed two vital tests.  He has scored well (in very limited opportunities)  with defensive numbers.  And, he's cheap.  There is a definite political dogma associated with players like him.  As the guy off the bench, I don't object, so long as that bench has legitimate bats to go along with him.  Point is well taken with Wilson, if he fails, it will be a definite black mark on current administration.  No chance for the JD Drew argument here, he simply doesn't hit well enough.  

Leave a Reply

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <i> <b> <img> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <div> <strong> <p> <br> <u>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.