Scott Boras and Arbitration Clients - I

Subscribe to Comments for "Scott Boras and Arbitration Clients - I"

Replies

kgaffney's picture
Submitted by kgaffney on

Maybe Boras has a sufficiently large client base that having no players sign away free agency years may be the most profitable approach on average.  There will be many winners and a few big loosers, but Boras and his clients in aggregate win.

 

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

but if so, isn't that like saying ... on average, I would get the best results off the tee if I used a 3-iron every hole?

If on par-5's with wide fairways, I could do better with a 1-wood, why wouldn't I use different clubs on different holes?

kgaffney's picture
Submitted by kgaffney on

I like your analogy, but Boras faces a much more difficult situation.  In golf I believe that many times there isn't a lot of uncertainty about the club only the execution.  In Boras' situation, both are unclear.

Let's look at some data.  Albert Pujols made $14M last year while Texiera made $21M, even though Pujols is a far superior player -- by the tune of 9.5 WAR over the last three years.  Pujols could probably be earning $10-15M a year more if he had gone to free agency.

If could quite possibly be that the cost of not having the Pujols of the world go to free agency exceeds the cost of having someone get hurt before they reach free agency.  An oft injured, but talented, player like Nick Johnson still get $4-8M a year, so the cost is mostly in contract years. 

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

And I can easily imagine Boras sitting in his deluxe chair, seething about (rare) Pujols situations he's found himself in.

So, you drove me back across the field quite a ways there :- )

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

You're smarter than Boras, Kelly.  ...

You say,

If could quite possibly be that the cost of not having the Pujols of the world go to free agency exceeds the cost of having someone get hurt before they reach free agency.

In Edwin Jackson's specific case, right here right now, what is YOUR assessment?  I'm GM and you're his agent.  I offer you $7, $10, $11, $13m guaranteed.   You take it (and your 5%, $2.05 million) or you roll the dice?   Is it even a close call to you?

With *Jackson.*

Looks to me like the 4/$41 could easily turn out to be 4/$15 or 4/$20 if Jackson has a lousy year or two (much less, comes up with the ol' shoulder stiffness in June).   And it's much harder to envision 4/$55m in any scenario.

The free agency is there after four years.

..................

Where am I going wrong w/r/t Edwin Jackson?

kgaffney's picture
Submitted by kgaffney on

I encourage my client to take the offer.  I think the key ingredient to understanding Boras and his appeal to players is that he's as competitive as they are.

 

Leave a Reply

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.