

Okay... so our infield brings us up to approximately 60 wins.
Projecting forward... if extremely rough numbers for OF+DH (12 WAR), the rotation (10 WAR from our co-aces, and 7 WAR from Snell/RRS/Vargas/Fister/Bedard/?), and our bullpen (4 WAR) are in the ballpark... we're looking at the vicinity of a 93-win season, plus or minus.
I personally can't wait to see the refinement you bring to those numbers, Matt... I thought those numbers of mine (based on adjusted-down earlier projections of yours, really) were pessimistic.
Vegas has this team for 83 wins? I'm taking the over every time.
I am really...REALLY having a hard time understanding exactly how the Mariners are anything less than a 90 win club as currently constructed. I'm projecting the absolute worst case scenario for Jack Wilson and Casey Kotchman, a relatively negative outcome defensively from the Lopez/Figgins switcheroo and nothing more than persistence in terms of production rate for any of the infielders cited with the possible exception of a very slight uptick from Jose Lopez offensively and a nice rookie season for Adam Moore. I don't get it. I don't see where I'm missing a huge cluster of negative wins that kill this team's chances at winning 90.
If you're willing to play Tui and perhaps even Garko at corner spots (he's played 12 games in the OF), use Ichiro at CF on Guti off days (he had 152 GS at CF last year), then you can keep Sweeney and still have a backup infielder other than Tui (Josh W. or Hannahan).
Or even a four-man bench with Sweeney, Tui, Garko/Kotch and Johnson/Moore? Leaving Tui as the backup at every position except 1b?
Not their style, but sure seems like Sweeney would give the offense a much-needed boost, and Byrnes has yet to draw a walk. Langerhans has 5 walks, but only 2 hits (.133/.409/.200).
Anyone think they'd do that?
I think given Bradley's propensity for getting ejected from games for no darned reason by unfair umpires that we have to have a 4th outfielder. I am projecting an early-season bench of Sweeney/Tui/Johnson/Langerhans and a later 5-man bench that includes Garko.
Good point about MB and ejections. And even though I expect the Lee suspension to be shortened, such that he can start game #5, they will be technically short a pitcher on Opening Day.
So I went back to look if Sweeney had played any 1b this spring. Nope. Nada. DH only. So I don't see them keeping him over Garko, even for a short time, without any game action at first.
It's a really tough call if Sweeney is DH only.
While I'm here, a good Churchill thread: http://prospectinsider.com/view/notes-from-the-desert/
Includes notes on some of the future SS candidates -- Triunfel, Franklin, Noriega. I assume this year will go a long way in determining if they think Triunfel is an everyday SS in the bigs. If so, he'll be here by the time Wilson's deal is over. Franklin/Noriega would need another stopgap.
Re: Sweeney...I think if you whisper sweet nothings in his ear and promise he'll be right bakc up when we can cut down the pitching staff to 11 in a few weeks...he'll accept a very temporary AAA demotion or "DL" stint (Mariners place Mike Sweeney on the DL for *win wink* back spasms).
He wants to play here if they want him around...he'll work with the club if need be.
Personally I'm even a little skeptical that Triunfel will stick at SS. He seems to have a little Yuniesky Betancourt in him...
If he does, great, but...
If he doesn't make big gains as a prospect, he gets traded somewhere while he still has any stock left and we never hear from him again. If he can't stick at short, he could still stick elsewhere if his power shows up. But I'm skeptical of him as ever being a big name prospect we remember as gelling. We'll see.
But as far as what Zduriencik is going to do with him, agree, it sounds like his status within the org could be on thin ice...
Am sure that Triunfel is going to slam back onto the radar very shortly... very unlikely he takes the late-bloomer path that Tui did...
I have doubts as to whether he'll ever turn into the superstar ceiling player we are hoping for...but I'm not saying if he doesn't hit for power this year, he never will. :) I think he's eventually going to make it to the show for someone...just a question of how motivated he is to learn and improve his plate discipline and defense.