You are here

POTD Aaron Harang -- A Game

Replies

G_Money's picture
Submitted by G_Money on
I'd give you Matt Tuiasosopo for 'im.
 
We'd owe Aaron 12 million+ in each of the next 2 seasons and his option would become mutual (see below).  I'd want the Reds to chip in some cash (which they offered to the Dodgers), and I'm sure they'd want back a pitcher (which they also wanted from the Dodgers).
  
When the Dodgers were trying to get Harang, here was the rumor:
  
Yahoo's Jeff Passan hears that the trade talks are not dead. The Reds want a decent prospect plus George Sherrill for Harang, since they're willing to eat almost $10MM of Harang's $14MM salary to make the deal cost-neutral for the Dodgers.
 
And previously:
 
The Reds seek "one or two players on the Dodgers' major league roster in return."  Hernandez notes that if traded Harang would be guaranteed $15MM for one year; his 2011 option would become mutual and the buyout would increase.  The Reds would have to pick up part of the tab.
 
We could trade Mark Lowe + Tui for him, probably.  I happen to like Harang a lot in our park with our D.  Even if he becomes a bit flyball-HR succeptible, it won't be until at least June when the weather heats up.  April and May?  Nothing he throws should be leaving the park.
And trading Lowe doesn't hurt as much since we added League and Texeira.  For something like a 7 mil expenditure on Harang, that seems doable.
If we're gonna build on pitching and defense, then make sure the pitching is locked down.  I like Harang far more than other options like Wash, and they should cost about the same dollar-wise (with the money the Reds will contribute).  Then it just matters if you like Lowe+Wash better than Harang.
 
I don't, but there's definitely an argument there, especially if you like the prospect we send as well.
~G

M-Pops's picture
Submitted by M-Pops on

"If Harang pitches 210 innings in 2010, the option increases to $13 million. If he is traded, the option becomes mutual and increases to $14 million, with a $2.5 million buyout." -AP

So Harang costs 15 mill. for next season (12.5 salary and 2.5 buyout).  How about they pick up the buyout and we flick them Snell(4.25 mill)+Varvarro/Orta+Chavez instead of Lowe and Tui?  For 8.25 mill, the M's turn Snell into Harang and get exclusive negotiating rights at the end of the season or a sandwich pick.    

If Harang has a good year, maybe Z can negotiate a Jack Wilson-esque extension and avoid having to buy him out :)

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

That one is definitely calculating four moves ahead...

I'll visualize the fifth one:  after the electroshock pitcher therapy of Cincinnati, I'll bet that Harang would be so hysterical with relief to be here, that he'd pay us to play...

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

I'd almost forgotten that the Reds were picking up a ton of Harang's salary -- no doubt the reason the M's were linked to him.

His Saturday morning stats the last two years are enough to send an agent screaming into the night, which makes him that much more of a BUY opportunity.  Even the modern GM evidently has a tough time selling a 6-17 pitcher.

Harang is a lot closer to a 17-6 pitcher than a 6-17 one, though, and I'd be very intrigued to see if, after the 160-180 innings for two years, he didn't come out firing bullets again...

Leave a Reply

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <i> <b> <img> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <div> <strong> <p> <br> <u>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.